2001
DOI: 10.1109/18.923757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signal detection using approximate Karhunen-Loeve expansions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the signal is known, the best detection is a generalised matched filter, and if the signal contains unknown parameters, the best detection is a generalised likelihood ratio test (GLRT). However, both of that require pre‐processing the received signal prior to remove its correlation by the Karhunen–Loève (K‐L) transform or a pre‐whitening filter, which lead to a complicated calculation [1–3]. Transforming the received signal into the frequency domain for detection is simple, but it lacks the systematic analysis of the detection performance [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the signal is known, the best detection is a generalised matched filter, and if the signal contains unknown parameters, the best detection is a generalised likelihood ratio test (GLRT). However, both of that require pre‐processing the received signal prior to remove its correlation by the Karhunen–Loève (K‐L) transform or a pre‐whitening filter, which lead to a complicated calculation [1–3]. Transforming the received signal into the frequency domain for detection is simple, but it lacks the systematic analysis of the detection performance [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%