2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sign tests for long-memory time series

Abstract: This paper proposes sign-based tests for simple and composite hypotheses on the longmemory parameter of a time series process. The tests allow for nonstationary hypothesis, such as unit root, as well as for stationary hypotheses, such as weak dependence or no integration. The proposed generalized Lagrange multiplier sign tests for simple hypotheses on the longmemory parameter are exact and locally optimal among those in their class. We also propose tests for composite hypotheses on the parameters of ARFIMA(p, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where (2) i is the second derivative of i ( ) and is some point between 0 and T : Note that (2) i ( ) Ci 1 log 2 i, i = 1; : : : ; T by Lemma 1(b) of Delgado and Velasco (2005).…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where (2) i is the second derivative of i ( ) and is some point between 0 and T : Note that (2) i ( ) Ci 1 log 2 i, i = 1; : : : ; T by Lemma 1(b) of Delgado and Velasco (2005).…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sharp contrast, fractional integration testing has barely received attention in this context. Li and Li (2008) discuss the asymptotic properties of LAD estimators in a fully parametric modelling context for a class of ARFIMA-GARCH models in a Laplace quasi-maximum likelihood estimation setting, while Delgado and Velasco (2005) propose a nonparametric sign test for fractional integration under zero-median errors. The QRLM test at the median = 1=2 o¤ers robustness against excess kurtosis and constitutes a valid alternative to these tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where π i is the first derivative of π i and θ * is some point between 0 and θ T . Note that π i (−θ * ) ≤ C i −1 log i by lemma 1 of Delgado and Velasco (2005). Since (14) is O p (1) as it is showen next, it is straightforward to show that (15) is o p (1).…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 72%