2023
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1196114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sign learning of hearing children in inclusive day care centers—does iconicity matter?

Madlen Goppelt-Kunkel,
Anna-Lena Stroh,
Barbara Hänel-Faulhaber

Abstract: An increasing number of experimental studies suggest that signs and gestures can scaffold vocabulary learning for children with and without special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). However, little research has been done on the extent to which iconicity plays a role in sign learning, particularly in inclusive day care centers. This current study investigated the role of iconicity in the sign learning of 145 hearing children (2;1 to 6;3 years) from inclusive day care centers with educators who start… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 83 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contemporary research with a more nuanced and expansive view of iconicity has refuted the traditional view by providing evidence of iconicity's pervasiveness in both spoken and signed languages from around the world (Dingemanse et al, 2015;Perniss et al, 2010). Consistent with this view, iconicity facilitates the acquisition of L1 signs by deaf children from a variety of languages, including American Sign Language (ASL; Caselli & Pyers, 2017), British Sign Language (BSL; Thompson et al, 2012), Turkish Sign Language (Sümer et al, 2017), Israeli Sign Language (Novogrodsky & Meir, 2020), and the acquisition of L2 signs from German Sign Language by hearing children (Goppelt-Kunkel et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Contemporary research with a more nuanced and expansive view of iconicity has refuted the traditional view by providing evidence of iconicity's pervasiveness in both spoken and signed languages from around the world (Dingemanse et al, 2015;Perniss et al, 2010). Consistent with this view, iconicity facilitates the acquisition of L1 signs by deaf children from a variety of languages, including American Sign Language (ASL; Caselli & Pyers, 2017), British Sign Language (BSL; Thompson et al, 2012), Turkish Sign Language (Sümer et al, 2017), Israeli Sign Language (Novogrodsky & Meir, 2020), and the acquisition of L2 signs from German Sign Language by hearing children (Goppelt-Kunkel et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%