2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-6723-7_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sign Language Recognition: A Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By utilizing this existing knowledge, the model can adapt more quickly and effectively to the new task, leading to improved performance and reduced training time compared to starting training from scratch. A research paper titled "Sign language recognition: A comparative analysis of deep learning models" published in 2022 (Premkumar et al, 2022), demonstrated a comparative study of a customized CNN and VGG16 models. The paper concluded that VGG16 was better where it delivered an accuracy of 99.56%, followed by customized CNN with an accuracy of 99.38%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By utilizing this existing knowledge, the model can adapt more quickly and effectively to the new task, leading to improved performance and reduced training time compared to starting training from scratch. A research paper titled "Sign language recognition: A comparative analysis of deep learning models" published in 2022 (Premkumar et al, 2022), demonstrated a comparative study of a customized CNN and VGG16 models. The paper concluded that VGG16 was better where it delivered an accuracy of 99.56%, followed by customized CNN with an accuracy of 99.38%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%