2012
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-2012-05437-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sign changes of the error term in Weyl’s law for Heisenberg manifolds

Abstract: Let R(T ) be the error term in Weyl's law for the (2l + 1)-dimensional Heisenberg manifold (H l /Γ, g l ). In this paper, several results on the sign changes and odd moments of R(t) are proved. In particular, it is proved that for some sufficiently large constant c, R(t) changes sign in the interval [T, T +c √ T ] for all large T . Moreover, for a small constant c 1 there exist infinitely many subintervals in [T, 2T ] of length c 1 √ T log −5 T such that ±R(t) > c 1 t l−1/4 holds on each of these subintervals. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 dx, which would play an important role in the proof of Theorem 2.3. This type of integral was studied for the error term in the mean square of ζ( 1 2 + it) by Good [2], for the error term in the Dirichlet divisor problem by Jutila [10] and for the error term in Weyl's law for Heisenberg manifold by Tsang and Zhai [16]. Here we follows the approach of Tsang and Zhai [16] and prove the following Lemma 5.2.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 22mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…2 dx, which would play an important role in the proof of Theorem 2.3. This type of integral was studied for the error term in the mean square of ζ( 1 2 + it) by Good [2], for the error term in the Dirichlet divisor problem by Jutila [10] and for the error term in Weyl's law for Heisenberg manifold by Tsang and Zhai [16]. Here we follows the approach of Tsang and Zhai [16] and prove the following Lemma 5.2.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 22mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…where ψ(t) = {t} − 1/2 and {t} is the fractional part of t. Actually we can prove (5.7) from (5.9) without using Lemma 3.1, following the approach given in Tsang-Zhai [22]. And then we prove Theorem 2 and the corollary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Proof. We consider only the case of the " + " sign, and follow the method of proof of Tsang and Zhai [22]. Since U ≫ T 131/416+ε , the condition H CT 1/4 UL 5 log L implies H ≫ T 235/416+ε .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As was pointed out in [36], |Δ(x)| in the above can be replaced by Δ + (x) and Δ − (x) respectively (see also [37]). Here for any real-valued function g, g + = 1 2 (|g| + g), g − = 1 2 (|g| − g) denote the positive and negative parts of g respectively.…”
Section: Sign Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%