2009
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810291106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sigma factor mimicry involved in regulation of general stress response

Abstract: Bacteria have evolved regulatory traits to rapidly adapt to changing conditions. Two principal regulatory mechanisms to modulate gene expression consist of regulation via alternative sigma factors and phosphorylation-dependent response regulators. PhyR represents a recently discovered protein family combining parts of both systems: a sigma factor-like domain of the extracytoplasmic function (ECF) subfamily linked to a receiver domain of a response regulator. Here we investigated the mode of action of this key … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

13
191
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(54 reference statements)
13
191
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PhyR is a member of the response regulator family and is unique in that its output domain shows homology to ECF sigma factors (14,15). While the PhyR receiver domain (PhyR REC ) has a classic receiver fold with the conserved phosphorylation site and catalytical motifs, the sigma factor-like output domain (PhyR SL ) essentially retains an ECF sigma factor fold but lacks the σ 2.4 region and is degenerate in the σ 4.2 region, which are normally involved in promoter binding in bona fide ECF sigma factors (12,16). According to the proposed model (12), under unstressed conditions, the sigma factor σ EcfG is sequestered by its anti-sigma factor, NepR, and the anti-sigma factor antagonist, PhyR, remains in an unphosphorylated inactive state.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PhyR is a member of the response regulator family and is unique in that its output domain shows homology to ECF sigma factors (14,15). While the PhyR receiver domain (PhyR REC ) has a classic receiver fold with the conserved phosphorylation site and catalytical motifs, the sigma factor-like output domain (PhyR SL ) essentially retains an ECF sigma factor fold but lacks the σ 2.4 region and is degenerate in the σ 4.2 region, which are normally involved in promoter binding in bona fide ECF sigma factors (12,16). According to the proposed model (12), under unstressed conditions, the sigma factor σ EcfG is sequestered by its anti-sigma factor, NepR, and the anti-sigma factor antagonist, PhyR, remains in an unphosphorylated inactive state.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recently discovered an original anti-sigma factor antagonist, PhyR, involved in a partner-switching mechanism governing the general stress response in Alphaproteobacteria (12)(13)(14). PhyR is a member of the response regulator family and is unique in that its output domain shows homology to ECF sigma factors (14,15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Alphaproteobacteria, the GSR is controlled by an alternative extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factor, usually called σ EcfG (1) or ECF15 sigma factor (2), the activity of which is regulated by a conserved partner-switching mechanism (1,(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). In unstressed conditions, σ EcfG is sequestered by its anti-sigma factor NepR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon stress, the anti-antisigma factor PhyR becomes activated and binds NepR, thereby releasing σ EcfG and allowing it to bind RNA polymerase and redirect transcription toward stress genes. Because PhyR uses a degenerate N-terminal sigma factor-like output domain to compete with σ EcfG for NepR binding, this partner switch was coined "sigma factor mimicry" (1). The importance of the alphaproteobacterial GSR in natural environments is underlined by several studies demonstrating its requirement for survival and competitiveness in the phyllosphere in Sphingomonas melonis (10) and Methylobacterium extorquens (8), the establishment of symbiotic interactions in Bradyrhizobium japonicum (9), and host-pathogen interactions in Brucella (6,11) and Bartonella (3) species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under activating environmental conditions, anti-s factor activity is lost and the s factor is released into the cytoplasm. Inhibition of anti-s factor activity can occur in one of several ways: a conformational change in the structure of the anti-s factor, regulated intramembrane proteolysis (RIP) of the anti-s factor, or phosphorylation and partner switching by an anti-anti-s factor (Ellermeier & Losick, 2006;Francez-Charlot et al, 2009;Heinrich & Wiegert, 2009;Kang et al, 1999;Paget et al, 2001). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%