2016
DOI: 10.1093/database/baw102
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sieve-based coreference resolution enhances semi-supervised learning model for chemical-induced disease relation extraction

Abstract: The BioCreative V chemical-disease relation (CDR) track was proposed to accelerate the progress of text mining in facilitating integrative understanding of chemicals, diseases and their relations. In this article, we describe an extension of our system (namely UET-CAM) that participated in the BioCreative V CDR. The original UET-CAM system’s performance was ranked fourth among 18 participating systems by the BioCreative CDR track committee. In the Disease Named Entity Recognition and Normalization (DNER) phase… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was first proposed for coreference resolution [30] and then applied to other tasks such as temporal relations and quote attribution [31,32]. It has also been employed for various tasks in the biomedical domains, such as entity linking, coreference resolution, relation extraction, and concept normalization [33][34][35][36]. Our system can be seen as consisting of four sieves that capture different types of information: (1) context triggers, (2) short-range intra-sentence (i.e., intraclause) events, (3) long-range intra-sentence (i.e., crossclause) events, and (4) cross-sentence events.…”
Section: Multi-pass Sieve Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was first proposed for coreference resolution [30] and then applied to other tasks such as temporal relations and quote attribution [31,32]. It has also been employed for various tasks in the biomedical domains, such as entity linking, coreference resolution, relation extraction, and concept normalization [33][34][35][36]. Our system can be seen as consisting of four sieves that capture different types of information: (1) context triggers, (2) short-range intra-sentence (i.e., intraclause) events, (3) long-range intra-sentence (i.e., crossclause) events, and (4) cross-sentence events.…”
Section: Multi-pass Sieve Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that it is also easy to assess the contribution of each sieve to the overall performance. This is particularly useful when supervised learning does not work well, as discussed in the section on related work [30][31][32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Multi-pass Sieve Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite some initial results, there are still limitations of recent approaches for inter sentence RE. The end-to-end model proposed in [ 23 ] resolved intra sentence relation classification partly by using a multi-pass sieve coreference resolution module. It has the drawback of strongly depending on the appearances of antecedent and anaphor representations of entities in the text since there are many inter sentence relations not expressed through anaphor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relation extraction is usually considered as a classification problem. Three kinds of approaches have been applied to extract medical relations: rule-based approaches (2, 3), shallow machine learning approaches (4, 5) and deep learning approaches (1, 6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%