2014
DOI: 10.1080/13563475.2014.880333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sidewalk Informality: An Examination of Street Vending Regulation in China

Abstract: Street vending represents a vital and growing aspect of the urban informal economy that is often the subject of municipal regulatory efforts that seek to control, confine or extinguish it. In the People's Republic of China, recent developments and discussions on vendor rights and regulation underscore important socio-political and economic changes and concerns around the role of the informal economy in this country. As more of China's rural poor enter urban areas and turn to the streets to survive, the number … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In many cities, according to Bayat [30], state authorities attempt to wage a protracted war against street traders (p. 54); to enforce policies to eliminate them from public spaces, and to place them in state-controlled markets or marginal places. This links to the ways in which street traders are viewed as "out of place" within "modern" cities [10] where their eviction is often justified under the guise of a "global city" image [8,27,46], democratization of public space [6] (p. 345), urban aesthetics and public health [47,48], safety and control of economic activities [49]. It has been argued that the inclination of the state to eliminate street traders is driven by desires to tax the informal market, ease traffic congestion, control quality and legality of products, stop the privatization of public space, prevent unfair competition with formal retailers, and cleanse the image of the city [20].…”
Section: Formalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cities, according to Bayat [30], state authorities attempt to wage a protracted war against street traders (p. 54); to enforce policies to eliminate them from public spaces, and to place them in state-controlled markets or marginal places. This links to the ways in which street traders are viewed as "out of place" within "modern" cities [10] where their eviction is often justified under the guise of a "global city" image [8,27,46], democratization of public space [6] (p. 345), urban aesthetics and public health [47,48], safety and control of economic activities [49]. It has been argued that the inclination of the state to eliminate street traders is driven by desires to tax the informal market, ease traffic congestion, control quality and legality of products, stop the privatization of public space, prevent unfair competition with formal retailers, and cleanse the image of the city [20].…”
Section: Formalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 2006, the underlying contradictions have aroused opposing voices regarding the regulation of street vending from both official and public sides in China, particularly in Guangzhou and Beijing (Bell and Loukaitou-Sideris, 2014). For instance, on December 19, 2006, a Guangzhou local media institution sponsored an open meeting regarding the street vending management with the purpose of ''making suggestions for the building of a civilized and harmonious Guangzhou'' (Xinkuai News, 2006).…”
Section: Social Harmony and Regulation By The Spatial MIX Of Authorizmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hence, exposure to new experiences and capacities of urbanity through a wide range of actions and appropriations is likely within station areas. This is particularly the case in the station areas of the global South cities where spontaneous activities such as street trading variously emerge from outside state control [48].…”
Section: Forms Of Urbanity In Public Spacementioning
confidence: 99%