1969
DOI: 10.1029/ja074i024p05591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘sidereal’ cosmic-ray diurnal variations

Abstract: New data from underground mu‐meson telescopes, at depths of 40 MWE, in the northern and southern hemispheres are presented. Analysis in sidereal time of three years of data from the northern hemisphere telescopes and two years of data from the southern hemisphere telescopes confirm that a maximum intensity is observed near 18 hours sidereal time for telescopes pointing into the northern hemisphere and near 06 hours sidereal time for telescopes pointing into the southern hemisphere, in agreement with previous o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NS anisotropy derived in this way is very sensitive to the stability of operations of two independent detectors and can be easily affected by unexpected changes of instrumental and/or environmental origins. Due to the 23.4°inclina-tion of Earth's rotation axis from the ecliptic normal, the NS anisotropy normal to the ecliptic plane can be also observed as a diurnal variation of count rate in sidereal time with the maximum phase at approximately 06:00 or approximately 18:00 local sidereal time (Swinson 1969). A possible drawback of deriving the NS anisotropy from the sidereal diurnal variation is that the expected amplitude of the sidereal diurnal variation is roughly ten times smaller than that of the solar diurnal variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NS anisotropy derived in this way is very sensitive to the stability of operations of two independent detectors and can be easily affected by unexpected changes of instrumental and/or environmental origins. Due to the 23.4°inclina-tion of Earth's rotation axis from the ecliptic normal, the NS anisotropy normal to the ecliptic plane can be also observed as a diurnal variation of count rate in sidereal time with the maximum phase at approximately 06:00 or approximately 18:00 local sidereal time (Swinson 1969). A possible drawback of deriving the NS anisotropy from the sidereal diurnal variation is that the expected amplitude of the sidereal diurnal variation is roughly ten times smaller than that of the solar diurnal variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further discussion of any true galactic anisotropies appearing at these rigidities will be deferred until Chapter 4. Swinson (1969) proposed a different explanation for the phase differences in the sidereal diurnal variation observed from opposite hemispheres. He proposed that the anisotropy responsible for the sidereal diurnal variation was IMF sector polarity dependent and was directed perpendicular to the ecliptic plane.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Sidereal (North-south) Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jacklyn (1966) attributed this to a bi-directional streaming (or pitch-angle anisotropy) along the local galactic magnetic field. Swinson (1969) disagreed, proposing instead that the anisotropy responsible for the sidereal diurnal variation was IMF sector polarity-dependent and directed perpendicular to the ecliptic plane. The streaming of particles perpendicular to the ecliptic had been described by Berkovitch (1970), and Swinson realised that the anisotropy would have a component in the equatorial plane.…”
Section: North-south Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It turned out that both Jacklyn (1966) and Swinson (1969) were correct and that a bi-directional sidereal anisotropy and a sidereal anisotropy resulting from the north-south anisotropy coexisted in the 1950s and 1960s. It would appear that the amplitude of the bidirectional anisotropy diminished greatly in the early 1970s (Jacklyn & Duldig 1985;Jacklyn 1986) and has not recovered, a result that remains unexplained.…”
Section: North-south Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%