2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00165.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Side effects of antibiotics on genetic variability

Abstract: In recent years, there has been accumulating evidence that antibiotics, besides their antimicrobial action, potentially have a number of undesired side effects that can, at least in some cases, promote genetic variability of bacteria. In addition to resistant variants, antibiotics have also been shown to select mutator clones, thus stimulating evolution towards further resistance. Furthermore, mutations, recombination and horizontal gene transfer have been reported to be somehow affected when bacteria are expo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
81
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
81
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second case we found that these populations accumulated escape mutations at a much higher frequency and, therefore, were able to successfully infect the fully resistant hosts at earlier times in virus evolution. The second result was highly predictable, since it recapitulates the evolution of bacteria at antibiotic concentrations below the MIC (14) and has been solidly established. At subinhibitory concentrations of the antiviral amiR, mutant genotypes gain a fitness advantage, given their ability to replicate despite the presence of the antiviral amiR, whereas wild-type genomes may still suffer from the inhibitory effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the second case we found that these populations accumulated escape mutations at a much higher frequency and, therefore, were able to successfully infect the fully resistant hosts at earlier times in virus evolution. The second result was highly predictable, since it recapitulates the evolution of bacteria at antibiotic concentrations below the MIC (14) and has been solidly established. At subinhibitory concentrations of the antiviral amiR, mutant genotypes gain a fitness advantage, given their ability to replicate despite the presence of the antiviral amiR, whereas wild-type genomes may still suffer from the inhibitory effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Continued exposure to variable, subinhibitory levels of selective agents creates a circumstance where lineages with higher rates of genetic change have an advantage (254,255). Thus, an unintended consequence of the antibiotic revolution might be the fixation of bacterial lineages with inherently higher basal rates of mutation, recombination, and lateral gene transfer (153,175).…”
Section: Increasing Bacterial Evolvabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 It is well-established that antimicrobial/antibacterial pressure can select for either resistant cells or cells with an increased mutation/recombination rate, permanently becoming hypermutators. 39 Our studies indicate that the older as well as newer FQs, such as moxifloxacin, levofloxacin and gatifloxacin, strongly induce transient mutagenic mechanisms such as the SOS response. The multiple effects, mutagenic and otherwise, of sub-MIC FQs can be explained by the predominant activity of FQs as activators of stress response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,38,39 These effects include increased mutagenicity (transient), 39 phage induction and its sequelae (virulence), enhanced adhesion, integron cassette recombination 40 and others. 38 It is well-established that antimicrobial/antibacterial pressure can select for either resistant cells or cells with an increased mutation/recombination rate, permanently becoming hypermutators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%