2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10905-010-9246-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Side-Dominance of Periplaneta americana Persists Through Antenna Amputation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon further supports our earlier research asserting that roaches tend to move more frequently toward a left direction and are thus 'left-handed' [11]. It was clear from those tests that the locomotion of roaches was contralateral to antenna stimulation, yet turning to one side tended to be easier than the other, regardless of antenna removal [2,11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This phenomenon further supports our earlier research asserting that roaches tend to move more frequently toward a left direction and are thus 'left-handed' [11]. It was clear from those tests that the locomotion of roaches was contralateral to antenna stimulation, yet turning to one side tended to be easier than the other, regardless of antenna removal [2,11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…By mimicking the control mechanisms and physical structures of natural biological systems, engineers are able to design mechanical robotic systems to optimize their performance [2,8,9]. Hybrid robotic systems using insects have attracted particular attention in recent years [10,11]. The goal of those studies has been to remotely control insects with the purpose of taking advantage of their natural movements [2,8,9,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Brain lateralization, that was once considered a uniquely human characteristic, has been found and studied in a wide range of species, including nonhuman primates (e.g., Fernandez-Carriba, Loeches, Morcillo and Hopkins, 2002a,b;Forrester, Leavens, Quaresmini and Vallortigara, 2011), birds (e.g., Rogers, 1997;Rugani, Kelly, Szelest, Regolin and Vallortigara, 2010;Vallortigara, 2000), amphibians , fish (e.g., Andrew et al, 2009;Sovrano, Rainoldi, Bisazza and Vallortigara, 1999;Sovrano and Andrew, 2006) and invertebrates (e.g., Ades and Ramires, 2002;Byrne, Kuba and Griebel, 2002;Cooper, Nudo, González, Vinson and Liang, 2011;Davison et al, 2009;Frasnelli, Vallortigara and Rogers, 2010;Hobert, Johnston and Chang, 2002;Kigth, Steelman, Coffey, Lucente and Castillo, 2008;Letzkus, Boeddeker, Wood, Zhang and Srinivasan, 2007;Rogers and Vallortigara, 2008;Pascual, Huang, Nevue and Préat, 2004). Lateralization at the individual level (i.e., not necessarily characterized by a consistent bias within the population) is associated with clear computational advantages, such as the possibility to avoid a costly reduplication of functions and slow interhemispheric interactions, while allowing for more efficient parallel processing.…”
Section: Laterality In Social Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, evidence for brain and behavioural lateralization among invertebrates has been reported [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%