One of the most interesting developments in U.S. and European cities in the postwar period has been the growing prominence of the city planning function through which urban governments allocate and deliver public goods and services. Paradoxically though, city planning and its working assumptions of rationality and efficiency have brought city government under heavy attack from grassroot groups. The bone of contention is the question of who should control city planning--that is, elected officials, planners, or citizen groups. The answer helps to determine, in turn, the goals, content, and mode of operation of city planning.The history of the relationship between city hall and citizen groups has been mostly a comedy of errors underlined by mutual distrust. City government has tended to react to citizen groups as elements threatening the system of duly elected all-purpose government while citizens have criticized city hall as acting in a domineering fashion. The late 1960s saw a proliferation of neighborhood action groups in the U.S. and of student and workers groups in, among others,