1964
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1964.tb07493.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sick Absence in a Swedish Gompany Part Iv

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
6
1

Year Published

1969
1969
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With a general increase in hours of work or compulsory overtime an increase in the level of absence might be expected, and previous research (Medical Research Council, 1942) has demonstrated that this is so. However, Lokander (1962) found no systematic relation between overtime and sickness absence, and Buzzard and Liddell (1963) have shown results similar to our own in that coal miners who worked high overtime and many Saturday shifts tended to have least absence during the normal working week. Management commonly believes that high overtime is associated with high absence, particularly short-term absence, and many of the managers of the three working groups alleged that high overtime and high absence were linked, but there was no evidence of this at all.…”
Section: Shiftsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With a general increase in hours of work or compulsory overtime an increase in the level of absence might be expected, and previous research (Medical Research Council, 1942) has demonstrated that this is so. However, Lokander (1962) found no systematic relation between overtime and sickness absence, and Buzzard and Liddell (1963) have shown results similar to our own in that coal miners who worked high overtime and many Saturday shifts tended to have least absence during the normal working week. Management commonly believes that high overtime is associated with high absence, particularly short-term absence, and many of the managers of the three working groups alleged that high overtime and high absence were linked, but there was no evidence of this at all.…”
Section: Shiftsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This has not been confirmed recently with respect to sickness absence in relation to overtime (Lokander, 1962;Taylor, 1968a). The present paper examines the relationship between absence from work and attendance including voluntary overtime.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…178-9), however, shows heterogeneity for both attendances (2 = 39-017; d.f.= 2; P < 0 001) and visits 62 91 789; d.f.= 2; P < 0 001). Such heterogeneity of the coefficients (especially with lower values for non-contiguous years, as on the present data) has been noted previously for accidents (Farmer andChambers, 1929, 1939;Farmer, Chambers, and Kirk, 1933;Hilkkinen, 1958;Cresswell and Froggatt, 1963) and sickness episodes or absence from work (Snow, 1913;Lokander, 1962;Froggatt, 1967), which are phenomena where a proneness element is generally agree4 to operate and, as noted above, provided this heterogeneity is moderate it is held to be not incompatible with proneness under real-life conditions (Irwin, 1964). Despite the heterogeneity of the correlations on the present data we note ( Newbold (1927) and Arboue and Sichel (1954a, b) have shown that the expected sorrelation coefficient (p) cn be calculated from the parameters of the negative binomial distribution for the first (or second) period and so allow prediction as to future experience to be nade from existing datg, its power depending on the value of p. This is of great practical importance.…”
Section: Hypothesis Dsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Such heterogeneity of the coefficients (especially with lower values for non-contiguous years, as on the present data) has been noted previously for accidents (Farmer andChambers, 1929, 1939;Farmer, Chambers, and Kirk, 1933;Hilkkinen, 1958;Cresswell and Froggatt, 1963) and sickness episodes or absence from work (Snow, 1913;Lokander, 1962;Froggatt, 1967), which are phenomena where a proneness element is generally agree4…”
Section: Hypothesis Dsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation