2016
DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2015.1127212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Siblinghood through disability studies perspectives: diversifying discourse and knowledge about siblings with and without disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
29
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For Milton, concepts of her theory such as marginalisation, powerlessness, cultural imperialism and violence towards autistic people are the roots of ableism in autism research and clinical thinking. In line with the latter, we echo Meltzer's and Kramer's (2016) voice who argue for the application of more materialist, feminist and inclusive perspectives in siblinghood and disability research. While examining that the inductive reasoning and individual experiences matter and inform future research and the design of sibling support models, the siblinghood experiences of autistic people may also enrich the ways we conceptualise disability in family research and inform further social and mental health policies.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For Milton, concepts of her theory such as marginalisation, powerlessness, cultural imperialism and violence towards autistic people are the roots of ableism in autism research and clinical thinking. In line with the latter, we echo Meltzer's and Kramer's (2016) voice who argue for the application of more materialist, feminist and inclusive perspectives in siblinghood and disability research. While examining that the inductive reasoning and individual experiences matter and inform future research and the design of sibling support models, the siblinghood experiences of autistic people may also enrich the ways we conceptualise disability in family research and inform further social and mental health policies.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The potential of disrupted or damaging sibling relationships has often been over-emphasised by the previous research in siblinghood and disability research and adopted an individualised and marginalised approach. Meltzer & Kramer (2016) suggests that this focus is related to a long history of institutionalization of people with disabilities, as protecting siblings' wellbeing was one of the reasons that parents were encouraged by professionals to send their children with disabilities to institutions in the 1940s and 1950s.…”
Section: Siblinghood and Autism Spectrum Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This concern for our mental health pathologizes, classifies, and individualizes our sibling relationships, as Meltzer and Kramer (2016) explain. To pathologize our family relationships undermines the intersections of disability and mad studies that might critique such inquiry as ableist and sanist in its utter disregard for the socio-cultural and intersectional circumstances under which our stories unfold.…”
Section: Pathologizations Of Sibling Storiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for sibling stories in research I tell my story with gratitude for researchers who facilitate sibling storytelling (Burghardt et al 2017;Guse and Harvey 2010;Meltzer and Kramer 2016). Sibling disability research is an understudied area that has room for the cultivation of radical methodological approaches.…”
Section: Pathologizations Of Sibling Storiesmentioning
confidence: 99%