2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sibling composition, executive function, and children’s thinking about mental diversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Replicating recent work (Austin, Groppe, & Elsner, 2014; Bock, Gallaway, & Hund, 2015; Kennedy et al, 2015; Lagattuta et al, 2010, 2014) the current study documents an EF-ToM relation from early childhood into adulthood. These findings add much needed data to the emerging literature on individual differences in ToM in middle childhood (see Hughes & Devine, 2015; Lagattuta et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Replicating recent work (Austin, Groppe, & Elsner, 2014; Bock, Gallaway, & Hund, 2015; Kennedy et al, 2015; Lagattuta et al, 2010, 2014) the current study documents an EF-ToM relation from early childhood into adulthood. These findings add much needed data to the emerging literature on individual differences in ToM in middle childhood (see Hughes & Devine, 2015; Lagattuta et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…While work with young children often uses just error rates (e.g., Montgomery & Koeltzow, 2010; Sabbagh, Xu, Carlson, Moses, & Lee, 2006) , research with older children and adults frequently relies on response times (e.g., Prencipe et al, 2011). Moreover, prior work has demonstrated that error rates and cumulative response time are strongly correlated (Kramer, Lagattuta, & Sayfan, 2015; Lagattuta et al, 2011), and both have been associated with advanced ToM (Kennedy et al, 2015; Lagattuta et al, 2010, 2014). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, previous studies that measured many processes implicated in prosocial behaviors found that they were facilitated by IC (Carlson & Moses, ; Gailliot, ; Razza & Blair, ; Zorza, Marino, & Acosta Mesas, ). For example, studies found that children with stronger IC performed better on theory of mind tasks (Kennedy, Lagattuta, & Sayfan, ; Lagattuta, Sayfan, & Harvey, ). Hudson and Jacques () used a go/no‐go task to measure IC and found it to be a significant correlate of children's emotion regulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%