2014
DOI: 10.1080/03949370.2014.880161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sibling aggression and brood reduction: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not possible in either study to eliminate the possibility that sex ratios changed through time for some very different reason, unrelated to either population density or age-composition of breeders. In addition, we only evaluated secondary, not primary sex ratio variation; therefore, we cannot determine mechanisms to achieve it (Bowers et al 2013;Morandini and Ferrer 2015). Only further studies will help to separate these confounding factors, including the possibility of facultative brood reduction affecting secondary sex ratio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not possible in either study to eliminate the possibility that sex ratios changed through time for some very different reason, unrelated to either population density or age-composition of breeders. In addition, we only evaluated secondary, not primary sex ratio variation; therefore, we cannot determine mechanisms to achieve it (Bowers et al 2013;Morandini and Ferrer 2015). Only further studies will help to separate these confounding factors, including the possibility of facultative brood reduction affecting secondary sex ratio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sibling aggression over limited resources in nonhuman species is well documented (Salmon & Hehman, 2014). Studies on bird species show that in extreme cases, sibling rivalry may even result in siblicide through enforced starvation, physical aggression or eviction from the nest (Morandini & Ferrer, 2015). In humans, resource control theory (RCT; Hawley, 1999) suggests that asymmetries within a social group lead to social dominance and resource-directed agonistic behaviour is used for resource acquisition (Hawley, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Competition from nestmates over food is arguably one of the most important factors that influence young because competition for food often influences energy acquisition that is necessary for growth and development. Competition among nestmates is typical for species that raise offspring in broods, and the degree of competition can be a function of resource availability (Morandini & Ferrer, 2015), parent quality (Saino, Calza, & Moller, 1997;Smiseth, Ward, & Moore, 2007), and the number and characteristics of competing young (Godfray, 1995). In vertebrates, brood size can have strong consequences on some aspects of the offspring phenotype, such as body size and growth (Nilsson & Gardmark, 2001;Vitousek, Jenkins, Hubbard, Kaiser, & Safran, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%