Abstract. The Arctic–boreal zone (ABZ) is experiencing amplified warming, actively
changing biogeochemical cycling of vegetation and soils. The
land-to-atmosphere fluxes of CO2 in the ABZ have the potential to
increase in magnitude and feedback to the climate causing additional large-scale warming. The ability to model and predict this vulnerability is critical
to preparation for a warming world, but Earth system models have biases that
may hinder understanding of the rapidly changing ABZ carbon fluxes. Here we
investigate circumpolar carbon cycling represented by the Community Land Model
5 (CLM5.0) with a focus on seasonal gross primary productivity (GPP) in plant
functional types (PFTs). We benchmark model results using data from satellite
remote sensing products and eddy covariance towers. We find consistent biases
in CLM5.0 relative to observational constraints: (1) the onset of deciduous
plant productivity to be late; (2) the offset of productivity to lag and
remain abnormally high for all PFTs in fall; (3) a high bias of grass, shrub,
and needleleaf evergreen tree productivity; and (4) an underestimation of
productivity of deciduous trees. Based on these biases, we focus on model
development of alternate phenology, photosynthesis schemes, and carbon
allocation parameters at eddy covariance tower sites. Although our
improvements are focused on productivity, our final model recommendation
results in other component CO2 fluxes, e.g., net ecosystem exchange
(NEE) and terrestrial ecosystem respiration (TER), that are more consistent
with observations. Results suggest that algorithms developed for lower
latitudes and more temperate environments can be inaccurate when extrapolated
to the ABZ, and that many land surface models may not accurately represent
carbon cycling and its recent rapid changes in high-latitude ecosystems,
especially when analyzed by individual PFTs.