2012
DOI: 10.1001/2013.jamaoto.244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sialoendoscopy for the Treatment of Pediatric Salivary Gland Disorders

Abstract: To show that sialoendoscopy is both a safe and effective alternative to traditional treatments for juvenile recurrent parotitis and sialolithiasis.Design: Retrospective medical chart review.Setting: Two major pediatric tertiary care centers. Patients: Eighteen pediatric patients.Interventions: A total of 33 sialendoscopic procedures on 27 glands.Main Outcome Measures: Indications for surgery, age at onset of symptoms, age at procedure, sex, intraopera-tive findings, complications, recurrences, need for additio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other endoscopic findings were ductal stenoses (single and multiple), mucous plugs, debris accumulation, and dilations. [7][8][9] As for remission rate recurrent inflammation after the procedure, the rates found by Ardeklan et al 4 were 86% at 6 months of follow-up, including 50 patients; Capaccio et al 7 found 65% of remission after 30 months, with 14 patients treated with SE; and Shacham et al 6 showed a 93% remission rate, with a follow-up of 6 to 36 months after treatment, and 65 patients treated surgically. The authors show consensus to conclude that SE is an effective and safe technique in the diagnosis and treatment of IRP and that SE probably acts on the anatomy and physiology of the duct.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Other endoscopic findings were ductal stenoses (single and multiple), mucous plugs, debris accumulation, and dilations. [7][8][9] As for remission rate recurrent inflammation after the procedure, the rates found by Ardeklan et al 4 were 86% at 6 months of follow-up, including 50 patients; Capaccio et al 7 found 65% of remission after 30 months, with 14 patients treated with SE; and Shacham et al 6 showed a 93% remission rate, with a follow-up of 6 to 36 months after treatment, and 65 patients treated surgically. The authors show consensus to conclude that SE is an effective and safe technique in the diagnosis and treatment of IRP and that SE probably acts on the anatomy and physiology of the duct.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of the passing of the device and the irrigation and flushing of the ducts, many of the abnormalities related to the IRP, such as stenoses, debris, and mucus plugs, are eventually resolved by improving the drainage as well as the prognosis and viability of the gland in the medium and long term. 4,[6][7][8] In the studies accessed for purposes of this review, 22 cases of children with sialolithiasis (SL) were described. Of these, 20 patients underwent ultrasound investigation (USG) prior to SE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations