2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.spmi.2012.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Si-delta doping and spacer thickness effects on the electronic properties in Si-delta-doped AlGaAs/GaAs HEMT structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simplified band diagrams modelling by two back-to-back capacitors. Unlike homogeneous bulkdoped materials, where the electrons and ionized donors appear in the same spatial location, for Si-δ-doped heterojunction QW the electrons are transferred to the QW region while the ionized donors remain in the δ-doped layers [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] . Because of the separation of charges, a model consisted of two back-to-back capacitors was chosen to calculate the internal transverse electric field (F) and electric potential difference ΔV across the space layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simplified band diagrams modelling by two back-to-back capacitors. Unlike homogeneous bulkdoped materials, where the electrons and ionized donors appear in the same spatial location, for Si-δ-doped heterojunction QW the electrons are transferred to the QW region while the ionized donors remain in the δ-doped layers [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] . Because of the separation of charges, a model consisted of two back-to-back capacitors was chosen to calculate the internal transverse electric field (F) and electric potential difference ΔV across the space layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the homogeneous bulk-doped structure [7][8][9] , the uniform modulation doping in barrier layers of III-V QW structure can supply charge carriers in the undoped active channel with high mobility due to less scattering from ionized dopants 10 . Furthermore, the single Si-δ-doping (modulation doping with single Si-doping plane) [11][12][13][14][15][16] in the barrier layer with appropriate space layer thickness (t S ) can offer effectively more 2DEG than the uniform modulation doping. As compared to the single Si-δ-doping, the dual and symmetric Si-δ-doping (modulation doping with two planes of Si evenly separating into two sides of the active channel with appropriate t S , see Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major important layer in this architecture is the silicon δ‐doping layer. This layer has the doping concentration of about 2 × 1017 cm −3 ; it donates sufficient electrons to improve the conduction and the electrical properties of the device …”
Section: Device Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By changing the gate length, the oscillation response of the device can be adjusted. [16,17] But for the device structure shown in Fig. 5, the gate length is fixed, and the response rates of different gate lengths to the terahertz wave cycle are longer and the cost is higher in an experiment.…”
Section: Effect Of Gate Length On Terahertz Response Ratementioning
confidence: 99%