2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.appdev.2013.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shyness as a risk factor for second language acquisition of immigrant preschoolers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
13
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to Hypotheses 3.2 and 3.3, we found no association between English proficiency at age 10 and shyness development from age 10 to 16. This finding is not consistent with previous research on shyness and language proficiency (Chen & Tse, 2010;Keller et al, 2013;Polo & López, 2009;Strand et al, 2011) or with the theory that proficiency in the dominant language of a country (in this case, English) facilitates smoother and less stressful social interactions, contributing to lower levels of shyness. This may be due to a ceiling effect where youth were, overall, quite proficient at English (Mean = 3.35/4.00), so small variations in English proficiency were not impacting whether youth could communicate effectively with others.…”
Section: Correlates Of Shyness Trajectorycontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary to Hypotheses 3.2 and 3.3, we found no association between English proficiency at age 10 and shyness development from age 10 to 16. This finding is not consistent with previous research on shyness and language proficiency (Chen & Tse, 2010;Keller et al, 2013;Polo & López, 2009;Strand et al, 2011) or with the theory that proficiency in the dominant language of a country (in this case, English) facilitates smoother and less stressful social interactions, contributing to lower levels of shyness. This may be due to a ceiling effect where youth were, overall, quite proficient at English (Mean = 3.35/4.00), so small variations in English proficiency were not impacting whether youth could communicate effectively with others.…”
Section: Correlates Of Shyness Trajectorycontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…(vs. youth who immigrated) may behave more consistently with American social norms, leading them to have an easier time socializing with peers and experience less shyness. Prior research found that shy youth have worse second language competence and slower language development among immigrant preschoolers in Switzerland (Keller et al, 2013) and Chinese-Canadian adolescents in Canada (Chen & Tse, 2010). In the U.S., shyness was associated with decreased language proficiency in both English-and Spanish-speaking children attending Head Start (Strand et al, 2011).…”
Section: Shyness and Acculturationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paul (2013), Chishti, Amin & Yousaf (2018) and Namaghi, Safaee & Sobhanifar (2015) documented that shyness is significantly and negatively associated with English speaking scores and academic achievement. In another study, Keller, Troesch and Grob (2013) found that shy immigrant children learn second language more slowly and have lower proficiency of foreign language compared to non-shy immigrant classmates. Noormohamadi (2009) investigated the relationship between anxiety and the use of language learning strategy and reported a significant negative correlation between these two variables.…”
Section: Studies On Shyness Language Anxiety and Language Learning Smentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Shy children were seen to be particularly at risk, having fewer strategies for building relationships and opportunities for interactions. Keller et al (2013) noted that not only are shy children less likely to seek interactions, but peers and educators are also less likely to interact with them. In this study, it was apparent that often the NS children showed little interest in or were dismissive of EAL children.…”
Section: The Interdependence Of Language and Social Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%