2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2015.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shutdown versus M&A: An empirical investigation of Slovenian incumbent firms’ responses to foreign competition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of the long run, a one dollar increase in FDI will lead to 0.64 dollars (less than one dollar) increase in DI into the food manufacturing sector. Whilst the short-run result agrees with Jude (2019) and Kejžar (2016), it departs from that of Mileva (2008), who found a crowd-in effect for transition economies. However, in the long run, Mileva (2008) found a neutral effect for transition economies.…”
Section: Discussion Of Estimationssupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of the long run, a one dollar increase in FDI will lead to 0.64 dollars (less than one dollar) increase in DI into the food manufacturing sector. Whilst the short-run result agrees with Jude (2019) and Kejžar (2016), it departs from that of Mileva (2008), who found a crowd-in effect for transition economies. However, in the long run, Mileva (2008) found a neutral effect for transition economies.…”
Section: Discussion Of Estimationssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Cooperation instead of competition can be adduced for the crowd-in effect. Jude (2019) and Kejžar (2016) reported switching effects of FDI on DI for transition economies; short-run crowding-out effect to long run crowding-in effect. The magnitude of the possible linkage and spillover effects over time overcomes the initial competition effect.…”
Section: Previous Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Titarenko () examined the effect of FDI on domestic investment in Lithuania during the period 1995–2004 and concluded in favour of crowding out. Crowding out predominately seems to be a short‐term effect following foreign entry, as confirmed by Kosová () for the Czech Republic during 1994–2001 and Zajc Kejžar () for Slovenia. The subsequent growth of foreign firms’ local sales does not seem to induce significant crowding out for firms in CEEC.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The only studies we are aware of are Calderon et al . () and Ashraf and Herzer (), using panel settings, and Zajc Kejžar () and Chen George et al . () for the individual cases of Slovenia and China.…”
Section: Entry Mode Of Fdi and Impact On Domestic Investment Manda Vsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on this research, we focus on the relationship between foreign competition and make innovation activities in the USA. The foreign competition means the competition effect from a foreign firm, which can be measured by the log of the proportion of the import goods to the total production value (Kejžar, 2016; Liu et al, 2014; Wang, Lee, & Hsu, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%