Abstract:Six spontaneous shrunken endosperm mutants in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) were identified and described. Five of the mutants (se1 through se5) were inherited as maternal plant monofactorial recessives and one mutant se6 was inherited as a monofactorial recessive expressing xenia. The mutants varied in fertility, seed weight, and seive size assortment. Four mutants were located on chromosome one, one on chromosome three, and one on chromosome six, by using translocation breakpoints as markers. Mutants similar t… Show more
“…Rather than reviewing every mutation, we will discuss selected mutations that in our opinion provide crucial insight. There are a number of publications that contain a wealth of information about mutations affecting endosperm development in cereals (Jarvi and Eslick, 1975;Nelson, 1980;Neuffer and Sheridan, 1980;Satoh and Omura, 1981;Bosnes et al, 1987;Kowles et al, 1992;Scanlon et al, 1994;Kurata et al, 2005;Dolfini et al, 2007).…”
“…Rather than reviewing every mutation, we will discuss selected mutations that in our opinion provide crucial insight. There are a number of publications that contain a wealth of information about mutations affecting endosperm development in cereals (Jarvi and Eslick, 1975;Nelson, 1980;Neuffer and Sheridan, 1980;Satoh and Omura, 1981;Bosnes et al, 1987;Kowles et al, 1992;Scanlon et al, 1994;Kurata et al, 2005;Dolfini et al, 2007).…”
“…The segl character is inherited as a maternal plant monofactorial recessive gene not expressing xenia (5), and therefore segl plants produce shrunken seeds regardless of pollen source, and no segregation of kernels occurs within plants. This inheritance pattern is not typical of endosperm mutations in which sugar metabolism or starch synthesis enzymes are affected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach to the problem has been to examine a series of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) shrunken endosperm mutants which are inherited as maternal plant monofactorial recessives and do not express xenia (5). We investigated segl, a mutant of the cultivar Betzes, which produces seed with 35 to 55% of normal dry weight (2).…”
Previous work showed that the segl mutant of barley (Hordeum vulgare cv Betzes) did not differ from normal Betzes in plant growth, photosynthesis, or fertility, but it produced only shrunken seeds regardless of pollen source. To determine whether defects in sucrose uptake or starch synthesis resulted in the shrunken condition, developing grains of Betzes and segl were cultured in I'4Cisucrose solutions after slicing transversely to expose the endosperm cavity and free space. In both young grains (before genotypes differed in dry weight) and older grains (17 days after anthesis, when segl grains were smaller than Betzes), sucrose uptake and starch synthesis were similar in both genotypes on a dry weight basis. To determine if sucrose was hydrolyzed during uptake, spikes of Betzes and segl were allowed to take up [fructose-U-'4Cjsucrose 14 days after anthesis and the radioactivity of endosperm sugars was examined during 3 hours of incubation. Whereas less total radioactivity entered the endosperm and the endosperm cavity (free space) of segl, in both genotypes over 96% of the label of endosperm sugars was in sucrose, and there was no apparent initial or progressive randomization of label among hexose moieties of sucrose as compared to the free space sampled after 11), but not of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (6-8). Sucrose hydrolysis during transport into barley endosperm has not been studied using '4C-labeled sugars, but in a recent study of wheat and barley involving enzyme assays and sugar analysis it was suggested that sucrose is not cleaved as it enters the endosperm of either species (1).The purpose of this study was to characterize further the mechanism of the segl mutation by incubating endosperms of normal Betzes and segl in solutions of ['4C]sucrose to compare the sucrose uptake and starch synthesis capacities. We also compared their ability to randomize the label of [fructose-U-'4C] sucrose when supplied to cut spikes to determine whether sucrose hydrolysis occurred during sucrose uptake by either genotype.
MATERIALS AND METHODSEndosperm Incubation. Plants were grown in an environmental chamber as described previously (2). Under these conditions, neither anther nor spike emergence correspond exactly to date of pollen shedding. Therefore, for accurate determination of developmental stage, spikes were selected on the basis of kernel fresh weight for each experiment and these weights were later compared with typical grain growth curves to estimate days after anthesis. The experiment was conducted at 5, 9, and 17 d after anthesis. The palea and lemma were removed from each grain, and the grains from several spikes of each genotype were pooled for each experiment. Five grains were incubated in 10-ml beakers containing 1 ml of 2% (w/v) sucrose in 50 mm phosphate buffer (pH 5.0). Each beaker contained 1 ,uCi [U-'4C]sucrose. Immediately before grains were placed in the incubating solution, they were cut in half transversely under water with a razor blade to expose the endosperm cavity and apoplast to th...
“…Until late last year, when Ray et al (1996) showed that normal embryonic pattern formation in Arabidopsis requires the maternal expression of the SHORT INTEGUMENT gene, the only direct genetic evidence that the sporophytic tissues of the ovule may be involved in controlling either embryo or endosperm development was an isolated report of maternal-effect mutations that cause a shrunken endosperm phenotype in barley (Jarvi and Eslick, 1975). Colombo et al have extended our understanding of the role of the sporophytic tissues of the ovule during seed development.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.