2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-020-01386-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shrub Encroachment Following Wetland Creation in Mixedgrass Prairie Alters Grassland Vegetation and Soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the lower biodiversity function found in long-term exclusions could be explained by the absence of transhumant sheep role as non-discriminant seed dispersers (Plue et al, 2019), and to the decrease in habitat spatial heterogeneity generated by patchiness in soil properties driven by livestock activity (Liu et al, 2016;Ingty, 2021). Along with biodiversity function decline, shrub encroachment has also been found to hinder forage availability as a consequence of competition (Zarovali et al, 2007; Dahl et al, 2020), which is consistent with the lower forage production function found in plots under long-term transhumant sheep exclusion in this study. Also, grazing at moderate stocking rates can induce a production optimization process of herbaceous plants (Austrheim et al, 2014), that can be understood as a compensatory growth response induced by herbivory despite the herbaceous biomass consumption by domestic livestock (Oñatibia et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the lower biodiversity function found in long-term exclusions could be explained by the absence of transhumant sheep role as non-discriminant seed dispersers (Plue et al, 2019), and to the decrease in habitat spatial heterogeneity generated by patchiness in soil properties driven by livestock activity (Liu et al, 2016;Ingty, 2021). Along with biodiversity function decline, shrub encroachment has also been found to hinder forage availability as a consequence of competition (Zarovali et al, 2007; Dahl et al, 2020), which is consistent with the lower forage production function found in plots under long-term transhumant sheep exclusion in this study. Also, grazing at moderate stocking rates can induce a production optimization process of herbaceous plants (Austrheim et al, 2014), that can be understood as a compensatory growth response induced by herbivory despite the herbaceous biomass consumption by domestic livestock (Oñatibia et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shrub coverage and density increases have frequently been reported worldwide in tundra [1], wetlands [2], grasslands [3], meadows [4], and deserts [5]. Many studies have suggested that the shrub proportion increase is negative for ecosystem services in terms of loss of species and biomass [6], accelerated soil erosion [7], increased fuel loading, and advised control and removal of shrubs by cutting or fire [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesize the following: (1) Shrubs can shelter herbage and herbaceous diversity, and biomass beneath shrubs is higher than that outside the shrubs. (2) The soil nutrient content beneath the shrub is higher than that outside the shrub, while the salinity is lower than that outside the shrub, which is more favorable for plant growth. (3) In burned shrublands, the number and height of shrub resprouts and the height, density, coverage, and biomass of herbage seedlings are higher in shrub patches than in intercanopy spaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%