2014
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.3928.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

shRNA-seq data analysis with edgeR

Abstract: Pooled short hairpin RNA sequencing (shRNA-seq) screens are becoming increasingly popular in functional genomics research, and there is a need to establish optimal analysis tools to handle such data. Our open-source shRNA processing pipeline in edgeR provides a complete analysis solution for shRNA-seq screen data, that begins with the raw sequence reads and ends with a ranked lists of candidate shRNAs for downstream biological validation. We first summarize the raw data contained in a fastq file into a matrix … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While edgeR has been mainly used for examining changes in steady state mRNA levels from SAGE and RNA-seq data, by design, edgeR was intended for use with any type of count based sequence tag data in complex libraries, including nucleic acid bar codes (Dai et al, 2014). To do so, edgeR models the count variance across replicates as a nonlinear function of the mean counts using a negative binomial distribution while accounting for over all data dispersion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While edgeR has been mainly used for examining changes in steady state mRNA levels from SAGE and RNA-seq data, by design, edgeR was intended for use with any type of count based sequence tag data in complex libraries, including nucleic acid bar codes (Dai et al, 2014). To do so, edgeR models the count variance across replicates as a nonlinear function of the mean counts using a negative binomial distribution while accounting for over all data dispersion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-normalized count numbers per shRNA were calculated by aligning the sequencing reads to the input shRNA library allowing for a single mismatch. The counts tables were then used as an input for the edgeR based shRNA-seq bioinformatical tool for pooled shRNA screen analysis (Dai et al, 2014). …”
Section: Star Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells were harvested on day 2 (one replicate) or day 14 (2 replicates) post-transduction. p-values for shRNA depletion were calculated with the edgeR package (Dai et al, 2014) and shRNA p-values were collapsed into gene scores using weighted Ztransformation (Kim and Tan, 2012). For comparison of differential shRNA effects between two groups, log2-transformed shRNA fold-changes were scaled with peak median absolute deviation (PMAD) normalization using the GenePattern module NormLines (Cheung et al, 2011;Reich et al, 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On average 24% of shRNAs were depleted at least two-fold and shRNAs targeting core essential complexes, including the ribosome and the proteasome, were specifically lost (68% and 47%, respectively) ( Figure 1B). To evaluate the viability effect of individual gene knock-downs, we calculated weighted z-scores that combine the effect of shRNAs targeting the same gene and emphasize strong fold-changes (Dai et al, 2014;Kim and Tan, 2012) (see Methods). Common essential genes, as defined on the basis of previous RNAi screens (Hart et al, 2014), showed significantly lower scores compared to non-essential genes (p<0.001, Figure 1C).…”
Section: Landscape Of Essential Genes In Blmentioning
confidence: 99%