2018
DOI: 10.21799/frbp.wp.2018.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shrinking Networks: A Spatial Analysis of Bank Branch Closures

Abstract: As more consumers take advantage of online banking services, branch networks are declining across the country. Limited attention has been given to identifying any possible spatial patterns of branch closures and, more importantly, the community demographics where branches close their doors. This analysis uses an innovative spatial statistics concept to study financial services: Using data from 2010 to 2016, a random labelling test is conducted to understand branch closure clustering in the Philadelphia, Chicag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Amel and Liang (1997) show that in the US, market with high profit, large population size and high population growth are the prime motivating factors for the entry of banks. Other studies show that low-income areas are more affected in the closing down of bank branches than high-income areas (Tranfaglia, 2018;Bierman et al, 1996). For example, Bierman et al (1996) examine the impact of branching regulations on the number of bank branches in high-and low-income areas in the US.…”
Section: What Factors Influence Bank Branch Location?mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, Amel and Liang (1997) show that in the US, market with high profit, large population size and high population growth are the prime motivating factors for the entry of banks. Other studies show that low-income areas are more affected in the closing down of bank branches than high-income areas (Tranfaglia, 2018;Bierman et al, 1996). For example, Bierman et al (1996) examine the impact of branching regulations on the number of bank branches in high-and low-income areas in the US.…”
Section: What Factors Influence Bank Branch Location?mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Manifestations of these variations include the densities and proximities of banks, credit unions, and alternative financial service providers (Dunham 2018;Dunham and Foster 2015;Goodstein and Rhine 2017;Jorgensen and Akee 2017), which are often spatially patterned after neighborhoods' and communities' racial and economic makeup. Neighborhoods of color tend to have lower average densities of bank and credit union branches than their White counterparts, net of socioeconomic controls (Dahl and Franke 2017;Ergungor 2010;Goodstein and Rhine 2017;Graves 2003;Hegerty 2016;Jorgensen and Akee 2017;Morgan, Pinkovskiy, and Yang 2016;Tranfaglia 2018;Smith, Smith, and Wackes 2008;Richardson et al 2017). For instance, census block groups in the 1990s with higher percentages of Black residents had significantly fewer bank branches than the county average in Cook County, Illinois, which includes the city of Chicago (Graves 2003).…”
Section: The Local Financial Services Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, forecasts predict that the number of bank and credit union branches will continue to decline amidst bank failures, consolidations, and efforts to increase efficiency and reduce costs via technological advancements such as automated teller machines (Debter ; JLL ; Morgan, Pinkovskiy, and Yang ). The rise in popularity of online banking and mobile payments in the contemporary era is a contributing factor to brick‐and‐mortar bank branch closures (Servon and Kaestner ), as well as profitability and consolidation through mergers and acquisitions (Tranfaglia ).…”
Section: The Local Financial Services Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…p<0.1; * * p<0.05; * * * p<0.01Table B.4: Negative Binomial Lagged Regression -Cartel Births (1960-2018 Note: Robust standard errors reported in parentheses. * p<0.1; * * p<0.05; * * * p<0.01Table B.5: Negative Binomial Lagged Regression -Cartel Deaths (1960-2018 Note: Robust standard errors reported in parentheses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…p<0.1; * * p<0.05; * * * p<0.01Table B.4: Negative Binomial Lagged Regression -Cartel Births (1960-2018 Note: Robust standard errors reported in parentheses. * p<0.1; * * p<0.05; * * * p<0.01Table B.5: Negative Binomial Lagged Regression -Cartel Deaths (1960-2018 Note: Robust standard errors reported in parentheses. * p<0.1; * * p<0.05; * * * p<0.01Table B.6: Negative Binomial Lagged Regression -Cartel Discovery (1960-2018 Note: Robust standard errors reported in parentheses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%