Shrinking core? Exploring the differential agenda setting power of traditional and personalized news media

Abstract

General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: http://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

The Media’s Conditional Agenda-Setting Power: How Baselines and Spikes of Issue Salience Affect Likelihood and Strength of Agenda-Setting

“…Starting off from the puzzling and multifaceted findings concerning agenda-setting effects, the study used a very versatile data set to (1) recap these puzzles with more current data and higher It is important to better understand these contingencies because the media's agenda-setting power has considerable implications for the relation between media and public opinion more generally: Media-driven agenda-setting focuses and synchronizes attention to key issues, a pivotal mechanism against fragmentation of the public sphere (Geiß, 2015;Moeller, Trilling, Helberger, Irion, & De Vreese, 2016) and its capacity to exert pressure on politicians. Conversely, knowing the conditions under which there is no (or a negative response) of the public to increasing media salience would help understand the limits of the media's agenda-setting power; e.g.…”

Between Article and Topic: News Events as Level of Analysis and Their Computational Identification

“…As we have seen, scholars are concerned that a lack of overlap of covered events may be detrimental to democratic discourse (e.g. Moeller et al 2016;Schoenbach, de Waal, and Lauf 2005). Therefore, we will show how our method can be used to answer the following questions:…”

“…Crucially, it is not sufficient any more to this for every outlet, but for every individual user, which stresses the need for automatization. There is a pressing need for such studies: The unbundling of news consumption has explicitly been linked to a persumed (but not empirically confirmed) influence on the diversity of news events on users' agendas (Moeller et al 2016).…”

Online Health Information Seeking Behaviors among African Americans

“…Additionally, the information presented by traditional media is geared towards the public and often focus on -hot topics‖ and late breaking news (Moeller, Trilling, Helberger, Irion, & De Vreese, 2016). Thus, using these media sources for health information will do little to decrease their health risk and improve their health and wellbeing.…”