2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shrinkage mechanisms and shrinkage-mitigating strategies of alkali-activated slag composites: A critical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the designed GPMs specimens containing WCT showed lower drying shrinkage than the one obtained for OPC-based NC. Previous studies indicated that the drying shrinkage characteristics of the alkali-activated geopolymer composites are more complicated than OPC composites due to their complex hydration and shrinkage mechanisms [ 55 , 56 , 57 ]. Among these geopolymer binders, the shrinkage problem of GBFS-based geopolymer systems is particularly prominent, which is significantly higher compared to other geopolymer composites (such as FA, metakaolin, and coal gangue) [ 56 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All the designed GPMs specimens containing WCT showed lower drying shrinkage than the one obtained for OPC-based NC. Previous studies indicated that the drying shrinkage characteristics of the alkali-activated geopolymer composites are more complicated than OPC composites due to their complex hydration and shrinkage mechanisms [ 55 , 56 , 57 ]. Among these geopolymer binders, the shrinkage problem of GBFS-based geopolymer systems is particularly prominent, which is significantly higher compared to other geopolymer composites (such as FA, metakaolin, and coal gangue) [ 56 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies indicated that the drying shrinkage characteristics of the alkali-activated geopolymer composites are more complicated than OPC composites due to their complex hydration and shrinkage mechanisms [ 55 , 56 , 57 ]. Among these geopolymer binders, the shrinkage problem of GBFS-based geopolymer systems is particularly prominent, which is significantly higher compared to other geopolymer composites (such as FA, metakaolin, and coal gangue) [ 56 ]. Some reports indicated that the partial replacement of GBFS by FA can effectively alleviate the shrinkage of the GPMs systems but weaken their strength development [ 22 , 32 , 54 , 55 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dense microstructure and good durability of AAMs can retard the intrusion of corrosive ions from seawater into the structures to corrode the reinforcement, and thus achieve the goal of improving the durability of FRP structures. Furthermore, AAMs use industrial by-products as precursor materials, which significantly lessen greenhouse-gas emissions and energy consumption (Luukkonen et al, 2018; Zhang et al, 2020d; Zhang et al, 2022a), thereby achieving the double advantages of eco-friendliness and cost-effectiveness. Previous studies have concentrated on using AAMs or geopolymers in ordinary reinforced concrete pavements or structures (Deepti et al, 2016; Maranan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the oligomeric aluminosilicate uses water as a medium to reassemble into a new Si-O-Al network system [ 11 , 12 ]. At present, raw materials for geopolymers are generally obtained from industrial solid wastes, such as fly ash and blast furnace slag [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Compared to cement, the production of geopolymer can reduce energy consumption by about 60% and reduce carbon emissions by 80–90% [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%