“…The methods for soil shrinkage measurement can be divided into three categories based on the dimensional number of soil samples: (i) one‐dimensional measurement, such as the determination of the coefficient of linear extensibility (COLE) by displacement transducer/sensors (Bensallam et al, 2012; Braudeau and Mohtar, 2009) or calipers and rulers in the vertical direction (Cornelis et al, 2006; Peng et al, 2007, 2012; Schafer and Singer, 1976); (ii) two‐dimensional measurement, which involves, in addition to the vertical shrinkage, determining horizontal shrinkage with calipers (Huang et al, 2011), laser scanning (Braudeau et al, 1999), and photo graphing (Peng et al, 2007; Tang et al, 2011); (iii) three‐dimensional measurement to determine the volume change of aggregates or soil clods by wax/saran resin/paraffin coating (Bronswijk, 1991; Gray and Allbrook, 2002), balloon methods (Gapak et al, 2017; Tariq and Durnford, 1993), laser scanning (Rossi et al, 2008; Sander and Gerke, 2007), and a digital camera (Stewart et al, 2012). For the one‐ and three‐dimensional measurements, the soil volume changes during dehydration are assumed to be isotropic shrinkage (i.e., Bensallam et al, 2012; Mallory et al, 2011; Peng et al, 2012; Stewart et al, 2012; te Brake et al, 2013). However, at the soil layer and core scales, the anisotropic shrinkage of clayey soils has been recognized (Chertkov et al, 2004, 2005; Cornelis et al, 2006; Gapak et al, 2017; Huang et al, 2011; Peng and Horn, 2007), and the vertical and horizontal shrinkage deformations result in subsidence and cracking when drying (Chertkov et al, 2004; Stewart et al, 2012, 2016; te Brake et al, 2013).…”