The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SHRINE: Enabling Nationally Scalable Multi-Site Disease Studies

Abstract: Results of medical research studies are often contradictory or cannot be reproduced. One reason is that there may not be enough patient subjects available for observation for a long enough time period. Another reason is that patient populations may vary considerably with respect to geographic and demographic boundaries thus limiting how broadly the results apply. Even when similar patient populations are pooled together from multiple locations, differences in medical treatment and record systems can limit whic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the USA, a patient research system allows aggregating patient observations from a large number of hospitals in a uniform way. [52] …”
Section: Discussion Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the USA, a patient research system allows aggregating patient observations from a large number of hospitals in a uniform way. [52] …”
Section: Discussion Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizing the availability of patient data from federated EHR systems in many different sites, as well as in international multilingual settings is still challenging [2]. Although promising clinical data re-use for research is being enabled through the building of major emerging research infrastructures such as SHARPn [16], i2b2-SHRINE [6,11], EHR4CR [2], limitations and new issues arise [5,8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] The inclusion criteria were manually translated at each site to the equivalent local codes. Each site then ran the resulting query and their local i2b2 server generated a "patient set"-a list of de-identified patient numbers.…”
Section: Cohort Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%