2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2016.10.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shrimp STAT was hijacked by white spot syndrome virus immediate-early protein IE1 involved in modulation of viral genes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the potential up-regulation of STAT gene expressions in the early WSSV post-infection time points associated with previously described hijacking mechanism adapted by WSSV for viral replication [35], the MrST gene expressions were down-regulated in the early WSSV post-infection time points (Fig 1) of this study. This infers that MrST was negatively regulated during initial WSSV infection for viral hijacking prevention.…”
Section: Differential Gene Expression Pattern Of Mrst and Pmst During Wssv And V Parahaemolyticus/vp Ahpnd Infectionscontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike the potential up-regulation of STAT gene expressions in the early WSSV post-infection time points associated with previously described hijacking mechanism adapted by WSSV for viral replication [35], the MrST gene expressions were down-regulated in the early WSSV post-infection time points (Fig 1) of this study. This infers that MrST was negatively regulated during initial WSSV infection for viral hijacking prevention.…”
Section: Differential Gene Expression Pattern Of Mrst and Pmst During Wssv And V Parahaemolyticus/vp Ahpnd Infectionscontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…For example, M. nipponense had no significant STAT gene expression changes after Aeromonas hydrophila [33] and non-O1 Vibrio cholerae [34] bacterial infections. Interestingly, due to the immune signalling importance of STAT gene, there exists risk of shrimp STAT manipulation by the invading pathogens as demonstrated by the shrimp STAT hijacking by WSSV virus [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As observed above, the LvMKK4-LvJNK-Lvc-Jun cascade was activated at a very early stage of WSSV infection, as illustrated by the increased phosphorylation ratio of LvJNK and Lvc-Jun at 8 hpi (Figures 1D, 1F, and 1G). c-Jun is a transcription factor of the AP-1 family, and the transcription of WSSV IE genes, which are independent of de novo viral protein synthesis, are often driven directly by host transcription factors (Huang et al., 2010, Qiu et al., 2014, Yao et al., 2016). Thus, it is easy to speculate that Lvc-Jun could be hijacked by the WSSV to promote expression of its own genes, such as IE1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study also showed that in the shrimp Penaeus monodon the thioredoxin protein PmTrx, an important redox regulator, was able to bind to IE1 and restore its DNA-binding activity under oxidizing conditions, indicating a role for IE1 in WSSV pathogenicity (Huang et al., 2012). In addition, WSSV infection was shown to activate several host signaling pathways, and the host transcription factors of these signaling pathways, such as STAT, NF-κB, and AP-1, enhanced the transcription of IE1 (Huang et al., 2010, Yao et al., 2015, Yao et al., 2016). However, the actual mechanism by which the WSSV regulates the activation of the host immune system for its own replication is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, the virus hijacks host proteins to facilitate gene transcription. Shrimp NF-kB and STAT were reported to bind the promoter of the WSSV immediate early gene ie1, promoting its expression (11)(12)(13). Viral transcription factor IE1 then drives host JNK autophosphorylation to activate c-Jun and stimulate ie1, wsv056, wsv249, as well as wsv403 expression (14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%