2008
DOI: 10.1130/ges00164.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SHRIMP-RG U-Pb isotopic systematics of zircon from the Angel Lake orthogneiss, East Humboldt Range, Nevada: Is this really Archean crust

Abstract: New SHRIMP-RG (sensitive high-resolution ion microprobe-reverse geometry) data confi rm the existence of Archean components within zircon grains of a sample from the orthogneiss of Angel Lake, Nevada, United States, previously interpreted as a nappe of Archean crust. However, the combined evidence strongly suggests that this orthogneiss is a highly deformed, Late Cretaceous monzogranite derived from melting of a sedimentary source dominated by Archean detritus. Zircon grains from the same sample used previousl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
63
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Monazite in RM-4 and some zircon dates near 83 Ma may either be mixed ages (from beam overlap of more than one crystal zone) or suggest another possible episode of melt generation and crystallization ca. 83 Ma, an age of granite intrusion also reported from U-Pb zircon dating in the East Humboldt Range (McGrew et al, 2000;Premo et al, 2008Premo et al, , 2010). An age of 69 Ma for WRP02-7 and Rby111 does not match previously known events.…”
Section: Ages Of Crystallizationmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Monazite in RM-4 and some zircon dates near 83 Ma may either be mixed ages (from beam overlap of more than one crystal zone) or suggest another possible episode of melt generation and crystallization ca. 83 Ma, an age of granite intrusion also reported from U-Pb zircon dating in the East Humboldt Range (McGrew et al, 2000;Premo et al, 2008Premo et al, , 2010). An age of 69 Ma for WRP02-7 and Rby111 does not match previously known events.…”
Section: Ages Of Crystallizationmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The lack of dated inherited pre-Late Cretaceous cores in zircon in the pegmatitic granite contrasts with nonpegmatitic Paleogene and Cretaceous leucogranites and most other dated granitoids in the Ruby-East Humboldt Range complex, which typically include Proterozoic and/or Archean zircon cores or U-Pb evidence of inherited old zircon (Wright and Snoke, 1993;Premo et al, 2005Premo et al, , 2008. A sampling bias cannot explain the lack in the pegmatitic granite of pre-Cretaceous zircon cores either observed or age measured in our 73 geochronologic analyses and age estimated in another 49 probed zircon spots (Supplemental Table 1 [see footnote 1]).…”
Section: Lack Of Ancient Inherited Zircon Coresmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Zircons were picked and mounted on 1 disks and then polished to reveal cross-sections. Analyses were performed at the SUMAC facility at Stanford University following the methods of Premo et al (2008). AS3 (Schmitz et al, 2003) and MAD were run as standards.…”
Section: Geochronologymentioning
confidence: 99%