2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4380-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shoulder manual muscle resistance test cannot fully detect muscle weakness

Abstract: Case-control study, Level IV.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The HHD has good concurrent validity to a stationary isokinetic dynamometer (r = 0.81), 54 and has excellent inter/intra examiner reliability for shoulder external (lateral) rotation (ICC = 0.96/0.96) and abduction (ICC = 0.92/0.92). 55 The evaluation was standardized and followed the protocols developed and validated by Hébert. 56 Data Analysis Descriptive statistics were used for all outcome measures at each measurement time.…”
Section: Muscle Impairmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HHD has good concurrent validity to a stationary isokinetic dynamometer (r = 0.81), 54 and has excellent inter/intra examiner reliability for shoulder external (lateral) rotation (ICC = 0.96/0.96) and abduction (ICC = 0.92/0.92). 55 The evaluation was standardized and followed the protocols developed and validated by Hébert. 56 Data Analysis Descriptive statistics were used for all outcome measures at each measurement time.…”
Section: Muscle Impairmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nagatomi et al. 22 administered manual muscle tests to a group of patients already diagnosed with either a rotator cuff tear, superior labrum anterior-to-posterior lesion, or a Bankart lesion and found that patients with less than 60% of the uninvolved side strength were diagnosed as positive for a muscle tear, while none with equal strength to the contralateral side were positive. These authors also reported that there was a mixture of positive and negative findings among patients with 60–99% of the contralateral muscle strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This highlights the limited capability of manual muscle testing to detect changes in shoulder abduction strength. In a previous study, Nagatomi et al [33] obtained a 94.3% diagnostic accuracy in detecting a change in shoulder abduction strength for a 21.1% cut-off point difference when the contralateral side was considered. However, different shoulder pathologies from that of the present study were also analyzed.…”
Section: Manual Test and Dynamometry Correlationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, different shoulder pathologies from that of the present study were also analyzed. Nagatomi et al [33] also tested both upper limbs simultaneously. Assessing the strength from both upper limbs at the same time might be more accurate than evaluating it over two different moments.…”
Section: Manual Test and Dynamometry Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%