2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shoulder arthroplasty: Evolving techniques and indications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the latter, 33 were excluded. In 19 reporting on patients who had undergone RSA or TSA, there were no rheumatoid patients with RSA [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]; nine studies on patients who had had an RSA for various aetiologies included one or more rheumatoid patients, but no or insufficient information was provided on their outcomes [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]; three review articles on RSA in patients with various conditions gave very little information, contained in a short paragraph [35,36], or limited information [37], for the RA group; there were also two articles of general information on shoulder arthroplasty reporting no own case series [38,39]. Two additional studies reported enough pertinent and useful information on several [40] or many [41] RA patients undergoing RSA, but they were excluded because the mean follow-up was less than 36 months and the longest did not reach five years.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the latter, 33 were excluded. In 19 reporting on patients who had undergone RSA or TSA, there were no rheumatoid patients with RSA [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]; nine studies on patients who had had an RSA for various aetiologies included one or more rheumatoid patients, but no or insufficient information was provided on their outcomes [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]; three review articles on RSA in patients with various conditions gave very little information, contained in a short paragraph [35,36], or limited information [37], for the RA group; there were also two articles of general information on shoulder arthroplasty reporting no own case series [38,39]. Two additional studies reported enough pertinent and useful information on several [40] or many [41] RA patients undergoing RSA, but they were excluded because the mean follow-up was less than 36 months and the longest did not reach five years.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior attempts using unconstrained arthroplasty designs were met with limited success in this patient population [118]. While acceptable outcomes are possible with rotator cuff repair and concomitant anatomic shoulder arthroplasty [119], these patients are high risk for complications, and RSA is a more reliable treatment to restore function and eliminate pain in rotator cuff-deficient shoulder both with and without arthritis [120][121][122].…”
Section: Reverse Shoulder Arthroplastymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,19 Multiple outcome measurement tools have been used previously to assess results after shoulder treatment. Some of them (such as the Simple Shoulder Test [SST], 13 the Constant score, 4 the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score, 15 and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH] score 8 ) are widely used, but none has been accepted as the universal standard.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%