Should We Use a Capital Framework to Understand Culture? Applying Cultural Capital to Communities of Color

Abstract

Social science research on communities of color has long been shaped by theories of social and cultural capital. This article is a hermeneutic reading of metaphorical capital frameworks, including community cultural wealth and funds of knowledge. Financial capital, the basis of these frameworks, is premised on unequal exchange. Money only becomes capital when it is not spent, but is instead invested, manipulated, and exploited. Metaphorical capitals have been criticized as imprecise, falsely quantitative, and inequitable. Some research assumes that, rather than reinforcing economic class, metaphorical capital somehow nullifies class or replaces economic capital. Yet marginalized students, by definition, have been excluded by dominant culture. Compared to low socioeconomic status (SES) students of color, high SES students have a wealth of capital, in all forms. Metaphorical capital conjures the economic worldview of capitalism, imposing a capitalist, market-based worldview. Frameworks of metaphorical capital use neoliberal vocabulary, arguably endorsing capitalism's hegemony. The supposed metaphorical capital is not capital at all; by presenting it as capital, researchers' goals become inconsistent with their own theoretical frameworks. There may be better ways to theorize culture. This article concludes by proposing four frameworks-possibilities that interpret culture without relying on capital.

Examining the effect of early STEM experiences as a form of STEM capital and identity capital on STEM identity: A gender study

“…Although capital has been described as existing in different forms (e.g., cultural, social, economic, and symbolic), we focus on cultural capital in this study. Cultural capital is observed in embodied, objectified, and institutionalized states (Bourdieu, 1986), and allows individuals to acquire resources, skills, and knowledge through engagement with members of society (Hinton, 2015). Within the literature, disciplinespecific types of cultural capital have been described highlighting advantages that individuals accumulate within specific academic disciplines.…”

Disrupting Dominant Discourses: A (Re)Introduction to Social Practice Theories of Adult Numeracy

“…As noted above, students have also been found not to value their own informal methods (Civil 2016), while Oughton (2014) observed that students were more focussed on preparing for qualifications than drawing on their own funds of knowledge. Concerns have also been expressed about the economic metaphor, suggesting that it is more reminiscent of human capital (or 'banking') models of education (Oughton 2010;Hinton 2015).…”

Mothers’ Intimate, Imaginative Literacy Practices as Pushback

“…Although Hinton (2015) has questioned using a capital metaphor to discuss culture, we believe a FOK framework can talk back to deficit perspectives of non-dominant people. In this sense, FOK raise the ante to demonstrate not all funds relate to financial capital.…”