2012
DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should we test for tetanus immunity in all emergency department patients with wounds?

Abstract: Background People who present to the emergency department often do not know their tetanus immunisation status. The Protetanus test can determine whether a person is immune and can guide treatment decisions. Objectives To examine whether testing all patients for immunity is clinically advisable and cost-effective. Methods 200 patients presenting to the emergency department with wounds were asked whether they were covered for tetanus, not covered or did not know. All had their tetanus immunity tested with the Pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The active involvement of parents in matters of vaccine prevention may contribute towards restoring trust (Oyo-Ita et al, 2011, Fadda et al, 2015, Odone et al, 2015). Many parents have difficulties recalling the vaccination status of their child, which was shown by several studies earlier and confirmed by the current evaluation (Miles et al, 2013, McVicar, 2013). Parents need encouragement and support when keeping track of the vaccination record of their children (Thorpe et al, 2016, Varkey et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The active involvement of parents in matters of vaccine prevention may contribute towards restoring trust (Oyo-Ita et al, 2011, Fadda et al, 2015, Odone et al, 2015). Many parents have difficulties recalling the vaccination status of their child, which was shown by several studies earlier and confirmed by the current evaluation (Miles et al, 2013, McVicar, 2013). Parents need encouragement and support when keeping track of the vaccination record of their children (Thorpe et al, 2016, Varkey et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“… 6 A similar study of 200 adults showed that almost 40% of them had incorrect recall of their tetanus vaccination status. 7 However, one contrasting adult study in France did find that patients self-reported that their tetanus vaccines were up to date correctly about 96% of the time. 8 It may be interesting to pursue a prospective study in the pediatric ED comparing patients’/parents’ memories, EHR, and state vaccination registry to a tetanus rapid immunochromatographic test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physician notifications regarding tetanus booster evaluation in primary care settings have been shown to be beneficial; however, as not all wounds require tetanus vaccinations, it is unlikely that interventions similar to this will be advantageous in an ED setting. 17 Another study ascertained the cost benefit of testing wounded ED patients for tetanus immunity prior to administration of any tetanus prophylaxis. 17 An intervention such as this would remove the need to locate patient immunization history or make prophylaxis decisions based on patient recall; however, instituting a blood test (albeit finger-prick) with every patient presentation involves cost and time commitments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Another study ascertained the cost benefit of testing wounded ED patients for tetanus immunity prior to administration of any tetanus prophylaxis. 17 An intervention such as this would remove the need to locate patient immunization history or make prophylaxis decisions based on patient recall; however, instituting a blood test (albeit finger-prick) with every patient presentation involves cost and time commitments. Electronic notifications, linking immunization history with vaccination orders, and requiring scanning of products upon removal from medication dispensing machines are hard-stop interventions that could be implemented to decrease duplicate vaccinations and inappropriate formulation administration, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%