2023
DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01579-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should we exclude patients with peritoneal carcinosis of colorectal origin and high PCI from CRS + HIPEC?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is nicely demonstrated in a study of 15 patients with High Volume disease – which they defined as PCI ≥ 16 – where CRS and HIPEC successfully achieved 2-year peritoneal disease-free survival comparable to Low Volume patients. They also report a median survival of 14 months in their High Volume group [ 29 ]. More recently, a study evaluating CRS and HIPEC in 43 patients with extremely High Volume (PCI ≥ 20) concluded that it was to achieve similar survival to their Low Volume counterparts [ 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is nicely demonstrated in a study of 15 patients with High Volume disease – which they defined as PCI ≥ 16 – where CRS and HIPEC successfully achieved 2-year peritoneal disease-free survival comparable to Low Volume patients. They also report a median survival of 14 months in their High Volume group [ 29 ]. More recently, a study evaluating CRS and HIPEC in 43 patients with extremely High Volume (PCI ≥ 20) concluded that it was to achieve similar survival to their Low Volume counterparts [ 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%