2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8019.2012.01522.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should we continue to indicate meglumine antimoniate as first-line treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis in Tunisia

Abstract: Meglumine antimoniate compounds have been the mainstay of treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) for decades. We propose to evaluate the place of these drugs in this indication in Tunisia. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 67 patients treated for (CL) using meglumine antimoniate at a dose of 20 mg/kg/day for 15 day from 1998 to 2010. Clinical and laboratory data, tolerance, and outcome were precised. Side effects were recorded in 17 among 67 patients (25%). The average age was 44.4 years (2-86… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent analysis of systemic antimony toxicity in 67 travelers without preexisting morbidity, close follow-up of laboratory data was key for a timely suspension of treatment in 6 patients [38]. Recent observations in Tunisia suggest that antimony-induced severe adverse events affecting the kidney or liver are not exceptional [39]. Taken together, these observations reinforce the current assertion that the benefit-risk ratio of systemic anti-leishmanial therapy for CL requires cautious evaluation in the general population of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent analysis of systemic antimony toxicity in 67 travelers without preexisting morbidity, close follow-up of laboratory data was key for a timely suspension of treatment in 6 patients [38]. Recent observations in Tunisia suggest that antimony-induced severe adverse events affecting the kidney or liver are not exceptional [39]. Taken together, these observations reinforce the current assertion that the benefit-risk ratio of systemic anti-leishmanial therapy for CL requires cautious evaluation in the general population of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken as a whole, these results are promising, considering the increased incidence of human VL cases caused by parasites resistant to Glucantime [ 10 ] and the strong toxicity determined by this therapy in the sensitive cases [ 6 8 , 48 , 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mild to moderate adverse effects occur in most patients, including fatigue, arthralgia, gastrointestinal complaints, transaminitis, elevated lipase with symptoms of pancreatitis, mild thrombocytopenia, and ECG abnormalities [11,94,95]. Up to 25-65 % of patients require treatment interruptions [11,95]. Although most patients resume therapy within days, severe adverse events including more severe cytopenias, symptomatic arrhythmias, major cardiac repolarization abnormalities, acute tubular necrosis, and fulminant hepatitis can occur, primarily in patients over age 55 or with underlying co-morbidities [46].…”
Section: Pentavalent Antimony (Sbv)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to lack of FDA approval, US health insurance plans may not reimburse costs associated with intravenous treatment, and home antibiotic infusion programs are ill-equipped to handle administration and required monitoring [9•]. Mild to moderate adverse effects occur in most patients, including fatigue, arthralgia, gastrointestinal complaints, transaminitis, elevated lipase with symptoms of pancreatitis, mild thrombocytopenia, and ECG abnormalities [11,94,95]. Up to 25-65 % of patients require treatment interruptions [11,95].…”
Section: Pentavalent Antimony (Sbv)mentioning
confidence: 99%