2017
DOI: 10.5152/tjar.2016.0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should we Administer Antifungal Drugs Before the Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infection in Non-Neutropenic Critically Ill Patients?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we have also evidence describing the increasing rate of resistance to antifungals, even echinocandins, when used widely (9). We agree with Moghnieh et al on the need of a better selection of patients and a better timing for antifungal treatment.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, we have also evidence describing the increasing rate of resistance to antifungals, even echinocandins, when used widely (9). We agree with Moghnieh et al on the need of a better selection of patients and a better timing for antifungal treatment.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…In this case, the administration of antifungal agents depicts an empiric treatment, even though the selected population had a high risk of IFI based on known risk factors (i.e., broad spectrum antibiotic therapy, multi-site Candida colonization) (8). The enrolled population had a high level of critical illness (at the admission mean SOFA score 8, mean SAPS II 48) and this may lead to consider the timing of empirical antifungal treatment as "too late", potentially explaining the lack of effect on mortality (9). Third, other explanations about the paradoxical association between the reduced incidence of IFI and the absence of effect on mortality observed in the EMPIRICUS and other major trials on antifungal treatment may be interesting for the readers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to available evidence from RCTs, administration of antifungal agents before definitive diagnosis of IFI may lead to a reduction in the incidence of IFI, without any survival advantages in nonneutropenic critically ill patients (35). Physicians should evaluate case-by-case risks and benefits of antifungal treatment after considering treatment timing, risk factors, local microbiological epidemiology, costs, available biomarkers, and diagnostic microbiological assays in their institutions (36,37).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Untargeted antifungal treatment is defined as any antifungal intervention initiated before definitive microbiological evidence of fungal infection exists . At present, three different untargeted treatment strategies have been defined, namely prophylaxis, pre‐emptive and empirical therapy .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Untargeted antifungal treatment is defined as any antifungal intervention initiated before definitive microbiological evidence of fungal infection exists . At present, three different untargeted treatment strategies have been defined, namely prophylaxis, pre‐emptive and empirical therapy . Antifungal prophylaxis is used in patients with high risk of developing invasive fungal infections, including critical illness, recent abdominal surgery, haematologic malignancy, organ transplantation and treatment with glucocorticoids or broad‐spectrum antibiotics, and risk stratification has been suggested .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%