2007
DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2007.159277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should the tricuspid valve be replaced with a mechanical or biological valve?

Abstract: A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether patients requiring tricuspid replacement should have a mechanical or a biological valve. Using the reported search, 561 papers were identified. Thirteen papers represented the best evidence on the subject. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, weaknesses, results and study comments were tabulated. We conclude that there… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
1
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
17
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Mechanical TVs carry the highest risk of thrombosis of any cardiac valve with an incidence of Յ3.3% of patient-years. 2 This was evident in our patient because thrombosis of the mechanical TV was not associated with a similar event on the mitral side. Although there are no published guidelines for the prevention of thrombosis in patients with mechanical TV, warfarin therapy aiming for a high therapeutic international normalized ratio value is often recommended with or without additional antiplatelet therapy.…”
supporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mechanical TVs carry the highest risk of thrombosis of any cardiac valve with an incidence of Յ3.3% of patient-years. 2 This was evident in our patient because thrombosis of the mechanical TV was not associated with a similar event on the mitral side. Although there are no published guidelines for the prevention of thrombosis in patients with mechanical TV, warfarin therapy aiming for a high therapeutic international normalized ratio value is often recommended with or without additional antiplatelet therapy.…”
supporting
confidence: 51%
“…Mechanical valves carry a higher rate of thrombosis, whereas bioprosthetic valves have a higher rate of structural deterioration. 2 Reoperation and short-and long-term survival rates are similar among both valve types. 2 …”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…43 Thrombosis with mechanical tricuspid valves is rare (Ͻ1% per year), and overall survival has been shown to be equivalent between bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in a recent large metaanalysis. 44 Thrombolysis is considered first-line therapy for tricuspid valve thrombosis, as opposed to left-sided valve thrombosis, for which the risks of systemic and cerebral embolism are increased. In patients undergoing sternotomy with underlying conduction disease, placement of an epicardial pacing electrode can avoid the subsequent need to pass a transvenous lead across the native valve.…”
Section: Current Practice Patterns and Guidelines For The Surgical Mamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For tricuspid valve replacement in the setting of traumatic TR most experts would prefer a bio prosthesis given the clinical condition, other associated injuries and anticoagulation issues 8 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%