2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70081-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should the Temporal Cortex be Chopped in Two?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…View-centered descriptions provide information for the analysis of expression, whereas abstract, expression-independent descriptions provide information for the analysis of identity. This parallel processing model has generally been supported by the results of early neurobiological studies (for a critical view, see Tiberghien, Baudouin, Guillame, & Montoute, 2003). Neuropsychological studies showed that some prosopagnosic patients with an impairment in face recognition also exhibited a relatively preserved ability to recognize emotional expressions, whereas other patients presented the reverse pattern of performance (e.g., Humphreys, Donnelly, & Riddoch, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…View-centered descriptions provide information for the analysis of expression, whereas abstract, expression-independent descriptions provide information for the analysis of identity. This parallel processing model has generally been supported by the results of early neurobiological studies (for a critical view, see Tiberghien, Baudouin, Guillame, & Montoute, 2003). Neuropsychological studies showed that some prosopagnosic patients with an impairment in face recognition also exhibited a relatively preserved ability to recognize emotional expressions, whereas other patients presented the reverse pattern of performance (e.g., Humphreys, Donnelly, & Riddoch, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In the present case, we suggest thatthere is a difference in theway facial features can be used to makecontrasting judgements, but there is not necessarily a differencebetween processing facial identity and emotion. A failure todemonstrate qualitative similarities between a residual ability ina patient and the normal process in controls means that it is possibleto challenge the view that two distinct and/or independentregions sustain identity and emotion processing (e.g., Baudouin,Martin, Tiberghien, Verlut, & Franck, 2002;Ganel& Goshen-Gottstein, 2004;Martin, Baudouin, Tiberghien,&Franck, 2005;Schweinberger, Burton, & Kelly, 1999;Tiberghien, Baudouin,Guillaume, &Montoute, 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%