2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2013.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should the Mini-Mental State Examination be retired?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
70
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
70
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite having different inclusion criteria, our results largely concur with those of the meta-analysis by Tsoi and colleagues. 32 45 especially since the MoCA is both more sensitive to impairment in a variety of clinical settings 46,47 (including MCI, as demonstrated in the present meta-analysis) and available free of copyright in 35 languages. This is to be expected, given that the MoCA was developed with the specific intention of being sensitive for MCI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Despite having different inclusion criteria, our results largely concur with those of the meta-analysis by Tsoi and colleagues. 32 45 especially since the MoCA is both more sensitive to impairment in a variety of clinical settings 46,47 (including MCI, as demonstrated in the present meta-analysis) and available free of copyright in 35 languages. This is to be expected, given that the MoCA was developed with the specific intention of being sensitive for MCI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Newer instruments with greater diagnostic accuracy for detecting cognitive impairment and dementia are now available. (14) Some adjustments to the MMSE English version for use in Singapore are necessary: (a) Since Singapore has no distinct season changes -spring, summer, autumn or winter -there is a need to modify Question 5 of the standard MMSE ('What is this season? ').…”
Section: Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a reasonable change, which we support. (d) For sentence repetition, Feng et al (14) changed 'no ifs, ands or buts', in Q24 of the English version, to '44 stone lions', which is a tongue twister when spoken in Mandarin. Ng et al (16) used this in their research, as well as 'marah (angry, furious), merah (red), and murah (cheap)' for the Malay version.…”
Section: Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychometric studies generally report good reliability and validity in identifying moderate-severe cognitive impairment (Tombaugh & McIntyre, 1992) but weaker sensitivity/specificity in identifying mild cognitive impairment (Carnero-Pardo, 2014;Mitchell, 2009;Tombaugh & McIntyre, 1992). As with many cognitive tests, performance on the MMSE is known to be affected by demographic variables, particularly education, age, ethnicity, and language of test administration (Bravo & Hébert, 1997;Crum, Anthony, Bassett, & Folstein, 1993;Matallana & Reyes-Ortiz, 2011;Ramirez, Teresi, Holmes, Gurland, & Lantigua, 2006;Tombaugh & McIntyre, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, individuals from minority groups tend to have greater difficulty on items more closely tied to education, language, and other sociocultural differences. Another approach to compensate for assessment bias in minority groups has been to supplement or replace the MMSE with measures that are less influenced by verbal ability/education (Arevalo-Rodriguez et al, 2015;Carnero-Pardo, 2014;Crowe, Allman, Triebel, Sawyer, & Martin, 2010;Matallana & Reyes-Ortiz, 2011;Mitchell, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%