1980
DOI: 10.1097/00132586-198012000-00060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should Operations Be Regionalized? The Empirical Relation between Surgical Volume and Mortality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
594
3
29

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 511 publications
(647 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
16
594
3
29
Order By: Relevance
“…Our observations and those of others also suggest that academic and comprehensive cancer centers are associated with higher case volumes. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] Whether this particular association between nonwhite race and better surgical care exists in other malignancies deserves further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our observations and those of others also suggest that academic and comprehensive cancer centers are associated with higher case volumes. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] Whether this particular association between nonwhite race and better surgical care exists in other malignancies deserves further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our finding of an association between annual case volume and outcome does bring into question any need for regionalization of care to high-volume hospitals. Many studies have found improved outcomes with regionalization of care for certain high-risk procedures [14,[27][28][29][30]. This has led to volume-based referral initiatives by organizations, such as the Leapfrog group, for selected high-risk procedures [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…complex surgical operations. One of the first studies examining the relationship between hospital volume and surgical outcomes was published in 1979 by Luft et al [14]. Since that time, there have been numerous studies published on the association between hospital volume and surgical outcomes for complex, high-risk operations [15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence from some centers that short-term outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy are better at hospitals where a higher volume of these procedures is performed [95,96]. Sosa [90] et al showed that unadjusted mortality rates for all pancreatic cancer procedures increased as hospital volume decreased, even when the data were stratified by individual surgeon volume.…”
Section: The Hospital Volume Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%