2021
DOI: 10.1097/wno.0000000000001373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should Lumbar Puncture Be Required to Diagnose Every Patient With Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study was approved by the University of Toronto Health Sciences Research Ethics Board and adhered to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients were included if they (1a) met the modified Dandy criteria for the diagnosis of IIH or (1b) were in a typical IIH demographic and deferred lumbar puncture but met all of the other modified Dandy criteria and had mild papilledema and preserved visual function; 12,13 (2) were at least 18 years of age at presentation; (3) had at least 2 high-quality peripapillary OCT scans, defined as manufacturer signal strength of $5, between January 2012 and August 2022; and (4) had at least 1 eye with optic atrophy, defined as mean pRNFL thickness of #80 mm on high-quality OCT scans between at least 2 consecutive visits. 14 The exclusion criteria were (1) other ocular disease with the potential to cause acute optic disc swelling or visual loss and (2) systemic condition or medication associated with secondary intracranial hypertension.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study was approved by the University of Toronto Health Sciences Research Ethics Board and adhered to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients were included if they (1a) met the modified Dandy criteria for the diagnosis of IIH or (1b) were in a typical IIH demographic and deferred lumbar puncture but met all of the other modified Dandy criteria and had mild papilledema and preserved visual function; 12,13 (2) were at least 18 years of age at presentation; (3) had at least 2 high-quality peripapillary OCT scans, defined as manufacturer signal strength of $5, between January 2012 and August 2022; and (4) had at least 1 eye with optic atrophy, defined as mean pRNFL thickness of #80 mm on high-quality OCT scans between at least 2 consecutive visits. 14 The exclusion criteria were (1) other ocular disease with the potential to cause acute optic disc swelling or visual loss and (2) systemic condition or medication associated with secondary intracranial hypertension.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, measurement of CSF opening pressure during lumbar puncture has been prone to errors. 45 Furthermore, lumbar puncture may not be always feasible in the acute setting and need to be postponed, until a fluoroscopy-guided lumber puncture can be scheduled. 46 In those clinical scenarios, TOS may prove a valuable tool in detecting and further stratifying patients with suspicion of IIH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although TOS can reliably predict elevated ICP, it cannot substitute lumbar puncture performance, in the context of CSF analysis. On the other hand, measurement of CSF opening pressure during lumbar puncture has been prone to errors 45 . Furthermore, lumbar puncture may not be always feasible in the acute setting and need to be postponed, until a fluoroscopy‐guided lumber puncture can be scheduled 46 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, new observations, such as the perivascular hyporeflective regions postulated to represent dilated glymphatic channels (3), offer even greater insights into the pathophysiology of papilledema. With our ability to detect elevated ICP with funduscopy, and now to follow it quantitatively with OCT, some have argued that lumbar puncture is not necessary to diagnose IIH (4) when the clinical picture is strongly suggestive of the diagnosis. Nevertheless, we would like to emphasize that the parameters on OCT cannot be used to determine an exact ICP nor the underlying etiology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%