2016
DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000001445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should Levetiracetam or Phenytoin Be Used for Posttraumatic Seizure Prophylaxis? A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis

Abstract: ADE, adverse drug eventAED, antiepileptic drugCI, confidence intervalOR, odds ratioPTS, posttraumatic seizureTBI, traumatic brain injury.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown that Phenytoin and Levetiracetam are equally efficacious in preventing early seizures post TBI. This is supported by a body of literature, including well-conducted randomised-controlled trials [5,[12][13][14][15]. A meta-analysis of 1186 patients identified that the rate of early post-traumatic seizures was 5.4% with Levetiracetam and 3.4% with Phenytoin (no significant difference) [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It has been shown that Phenytoin and Levetiracetam are equally efficacious in preventing early seizures post TBI. This is supported by a body of literature, including well-conducted randomised-controlled trials [5,[12][13][14][15]. A meta-analysis of 1186 patients identified that the rate of early post-traumatic seizures was 5.4% with Levetiracetam and 3.4% with Phenytoin (no significant difference) [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…We found some differences between relatively lower versus higher income countries. It was striking that levetiracetam was significantly more frequently reported by higher income countries as an agent of choice for seizure prophylaxis and treatment, while valproate and phenytoin were reported more frequently by lower income countries, although high-level evidence in the literature on the agent of choice is lacking [ 37 ]. However, there were no clear structural differences in management overall, and this could not therefore be considered an explanation for the treatment variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inaba et al (n = 813) also found no difference in terms of adverse drug reactions or mortality between those on Keppra and phenytoin prophylaxis [ 3 ]. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis did find a higher incidence of adverse effects (13% versus 7%) on phenytoin compared to Keppra, including worse neurological status and persistent fever [ 6 ]. No data had previously been reported comparing adverse effects or long-term outcomes for those on early Keppra seizure prophylaxis versus no treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is less data comparing Keppra to no treatment or placebo. To date, only one retrospective study has directly compared the rate of early PTS in those receiving Keppra prophylaxis versus no treatment, finding a non-significant decrease from 3.4% to 1.9% in the prophylaxis group [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%