Purpose -Despite the strong focus on virtues in firms, humility is little recognized in the management literature and, more particularly in the literature about knowledge sharing (KS). Despite efforts to foster KS among employees in firms, the effectiveness of this process narrows down to the dyadic relationship between the knowledge seeker and provider within firm. This paper aims to investigate the role of humility in the KS process in dyadic activity. Design/methodology/approach -The authors undertake an exploratory investigation to fill some of the gaps found in the literature. The paper draws insights from psychology, history, religion, current events and management literature. Findings -The authors identify several individual propensities that help predict humility towards sharing knowledge from seeker (humble knowledge-inquiry) and provider perspectives (humble response). They propose a new conceptual process model of KS with humility as an important variable to consider. This work highlights several promising directions for future research. Originality/value -As per the authors' knowledge, this is the first paper that investigates the role of humility in knowledge sharing from dyadic perspective. The authors also introduce concepts of humble knowledge inquiry and humble response in a dyadic context for effective knowledge sharing process. j J j on the strength of ties, Chiu et al. (2006) and Wasko and Faraj (2000) on trust and reciprocity norms, and Mueller (2015) on culture at the individual level . However, there is very little evidence for the construct of humility and how it could foster KS. Humility is considered an ethical value in individuals (Jennings et al., 2005), an ethical requirement for managers (Argandoña, 2017) and one of the ethical duties of a leader (Caldwell et al., 2017), but appears to be neglected, or at least not highlighted as a primary virtue, in the business world (Argandona, 2015). Therefore, while being widely accepted as a virtue, humility has received little attention from organizations (Frostenson, 2015), especially in the field of KS. This raises the following questions:In a dyadic one-to-one relationship, does humility play a significant role in the KS process between a knowledge seeker and a knowledge provider?What individual and organizational specificities, if any, facilitate humble knowledge seeking and humble knowledge providing?This paper undertakes an exploratory investigation to answer these questions, attempting to theorize the construct of humility as an antecedent of KS, drawing its sources from research fields that are tangential to management. Specifically, in the context of a dyadic KS relationship within a network of relationships, we refer to two concepts related to humility that are emerging in the literature -"humble inquiry" (originally coined by Schein, 2013) and "humble response" (Leach and Ajibade, 2016). We investigate if there is a reciprocal relationship between these two concepts, and the factors that may moderate or mediate the effectiveness of ...