Should I stay or should I go? Ideals and realities of archaeology in the conflict regions

Abstract

Through the Ilısu Dam Rescue Archaeology Project, we explore ethical and practical aspects of rescue archaeology in contested territory and areas of conflict, at the mound sites of Başur H.yük and Çattepe in Siirt Province, Turkey. We are excavating the sites ahead of the Ilısu Dam's construction, a controversial project that the state supports but that others contest. One of the most important characteristics of these heritage sites is their significance for local community identity construction. These places have also witnessed conflict between the state and Kurdish separatists. The project is administered under overlapping hierarchies, which may have different, even competing interests. These manifest in conflicts between 'top-down' approaches to rescue archaeology, and an effective public engagement strategy. We discuss how the project can be a positive force, given the impending destruction through dam construction and the location in the middle of an armed conflict; and when it cannot.

Confronting the Present: Archaeology in 2019

“…There is still, for example, a continued questioning and reconfiguring of epistemological dichotomies, such as nature/culture (Cipolla and Allard 2019), urban/rural (Garrison, Houston, and Alcover Firpi 2019), body/object (Miniaci 2019), and human/nonhuman (Recht 2019). There is still a rise in archaeological scholarship that addresses contemporary politics and heritage (e.g., Apaydin and Hassett 2019; Brown, Liuzza, Meskell 2019; Kurnick 2019; Parga Dans 2019). Digital technologies remain on the front lines of methodological advances in the field (e.g., Cobb, Earley‐Spadoni, and Dames 2019; M. Douglass et al.…”