2020
DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.00712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should Flow Cytometry Be Considered a First Line of Study in the Diagnosis of Breast Implant–Associated Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While some cases of BIA-ALCL reported in the literature were evaluated by flow cytometry, in most cases the immunophenotype was determined by immunohistochemical analysis (Quesada et al, 2019). Meanwhile, a recent study using flow cytometry found 11.11% (4/36) of lymphomas associated with breast prostheses and suggested that this technique may be useful to detect and rule out negative cases (Romero et al, 2020). where CD30 positive elements were extremely rare (<5%), while in the confirmed BIA-ALCL cases atypical CD30-positive cells represented more than 70% of the cellularity (Di Napoli et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some cases of BIA-ALCL reported in the literature were evaluated by flow cytometry, in most cases the immunophenotype was determined by immunohistochemical analysis (Quesada et al, 2019). Meanwhile, a recent study using flow cytometry found 11.11% (4/36) of lymphomas associated with breast prostheses and suggested that this technique may be useful to detect and rule out negative cases (Romero et al, 2020). where CD30 positive elements were extremely rare (<5%), while in the confirmed BIA-ALCL cases atypical CD30-positive cells represented more than 70% of the cellularity (Di Napoli et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 16 More recently, various groups are assessing the role of flow cytometry analyses in the initial diagnosis and evaluation of breast implant-associated ALCL. 27 31 Romero et al 30 published a case series that identified four breast implant-associated ALCL cases out of a total of 39 periprosthetic fluid samples. 30 They identified a statistically significant difference in the percentage of CD30-positive cells between breast implant-associated ALCL and those samples without tumor (54.3% in breast implant-associated ALCL vs. 0.3% in non-tumor; P = .03).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our flow cytometric findings showed a similar immunophenotype to cases reported in published series and supported the use of an “ungated” CD30/SSC plot in breast implant-associated ALCL diagnosis. 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 However, evaluation of flow cytometric data in a larger number of cases should be undertaken to better establish its role and utility in screening seromas around breast implants. Collection of these data may be facilitated by the preexisting breast implant-associated ALCL databases to encourage research in this still largely underdeveloped field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Barr et al pointed that the malignant anaplastic cells in ALCL showed strong CD30 expression, high FSC, and variable SSC, with CD4 expression and reduced/negative expression of other T-cell antigens (73). Despite the presence of reactive CD30 cells, FCM is more sensitive and specific than cytology to distinguish between BIA-ALCL and negative cases (74). Therefore, some studies also proposed that the FCM method should also be regarded as the first-line diagnostic tool.…”
Section: Pathological Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%