1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70127-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should ERCP be routine after an episode of “idiopathic” pancreatitis? A cost-utility analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested that routine ERCP may be of marginal benefit in what may be an attack of 'idiopathic pancreatitis' 52 . However, recent advances in EUS and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) must call into question the role of diagnostic ERCP, especially considering its potentially serious associated complications 37,53 -55 .…”
Section: Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that routine ERCP may be of marginal benefit in what may be an attack of 'idiopathic pancreatitis' 52 . However, recent advances in EUS and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) must call into question the role of diagnostic ERCP, especially considering its potentially serious associated complications 37,53 -55 .…”
Section: Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ERCP reveals a diagnosis in about 70% of patients with IARP after a negative initial evaluation (1,15). Because the initial episode of pancreatitis may be an isolated event and because of the risk of ERCP, most agree that this procedure is not justified after the first episode of pancreatitis (37,147). Many believe, however, that ERCP is indicated when the first episode is severe or when a patient has two or more episodes.…”
Section: Ajg -September 2001mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pancreatitis (CP) is common in those with recurrent attacks who have previously undergone cholecystectomy. [10] Microscopic examination of bile, [10,11] endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), [11,12] and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) [13] have been used to find etiology in these cases; however, ERCP has some chances of complications and MRCP is inferior to EUS in detecting <5 mm stones. [14,15] EUS offers several advantages over these modalities; it provides better resolution to diagnose small stones/tumors [1] and CP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%