Regionalism in Trade Policy 1999
DOI: 10.1142/9789812815330_0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should East Asia Go Regional?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would mean that regional liberalization would in practice as well as in law be generally consistent with the m.f.n. principle (WTO, 1996, p. 11). Interestingly, this was the option considered in detail and preferred by the author in the context of regionalism in East Asia (Panagariya, 1993 and. The Director General expressed a clear preference for this option when he concluded:…”
Section: Open Regionalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would mean that regional liberalization would in practice as well as in law be generally consistent with the m.f.n. principle (WTO, 1996, p. 11). Interestingly, this was the option considered in detail and preferred by the author in the context of regionalism in East Asia (Panagariya, 1993 and. The Director General expressed a clear preference for this option when he concluded:…”
Section: Open Regionalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An EAFTA can help reduce political tensions and promote harmony between Asian countries but it will require enormous political will to push integration ahead. Yamazawa (2002) and Panagariya (1998) are equally pessimistic about the short-term future of the proposal. Munakata (2002) contended that such a scheme will take some time.…”
Section: Realizing Eaftamentioning
confidence: 99%