Should Drivers Be Operating Within an Automation-Free Bandwidth? Evaluating Haptic Steering Support Systems With Different Levels of Authority

Petermeijer, Sebastiaan M.; Abbink, David A.; Winter, Joost de

doi:10.1177/0018720814563602

Cited by 58 publications

(54 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In accordance with previous research, driving with continuous guidance and bandwidth guidance was found to improve drivers' lane-keeping performance compared to manual driving (Flemisch et al, 2008;Kienle, Dambock, Bubb, & Bengler, 2012;Marchal-Crespo, McHughen, Cramer, & Reinkensmeyer, 2010;Petermeijer et al 2015a). The Band condition yielded improved TOR compared to Manual but did not improve the absolute lateral error.…”

Section: Effectiveness Of the Band Systemsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…The bandwidth guidance is similar to the 'double bandwidth' system previously introduced by Petermeijer et al (2015a). This design was shown to mitigate over-reliance on haptic guidance, and may be a viable solution to speed adaptation as well.…”

Section: Bandwidth Guidance (Band)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Each of these three methods used a twolevel algorithm which was identical to previously published research (Abbink & Mulder, 2009;Mulder, Abbink, & Boer, 2008;Petermeijer et al, 2015a). The first level calculated the desired steering angle based on a two-parameter model that predicts the future lateral error between the lane center and the middle of the car (efuture_lat) and the future heading error of the car (efuture_heading), at a look-ahead time of 0.7 s. The first level was identical for each of the three tested guidance conditions.…”

Section: Designs Of Haptic Steering Guidancementioning

confidence: 99%

“…A driving simulator study by Petermeijer et al (2015a) found that drivers showed dangerous short-term steering oscillations, also called 'aftereffects', after the steering guidance failed just before entering a curve. However, as with most research on haptic steering guidance (e.g., Griffiths and Gillespie, 2005;Mohellebi et al, 2009;Mulder et al, 2012), the vehicle speed in this study was held constant.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The first design (Band) incorporates a lateral bandwidth whereby the guidance engages only when the vehicle deviates substantially from the lane center. This design was previously tested at a constant driving speed and was found to mitigate effects of over-reliance in case the technology suddenly failed (Petermeijer et al, 2015a). The second design is a longitudinal boundary system (ContRF) that removes the continuous guidance when driving faster than a pre-defined speed threshold.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Does haptic steering guidance instigate speeding? A driving simulator study into causes and remedies

Melman

Winter

Abbink

2017

Accident Analysis & Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

C o v e r i ma g e a d o p t e d f r o m: F o t o k e r e n ( 2 0 1 5 , No v e mb e r ) . Ni g h t h i g h s p e e d c a r f u n [ Di g i t a l i ma g e ] . Re t r i e v e dMa y 2 3 , 2 0 1 6 , f r o m h t t p : / / f o t o k e r e n . n e t / n i g h t -h i g h -s p e e d -c a r -f u n / Driving a car has become a major part of our life. To assist drivers during this task new Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) are developed to increase safety and comfort. In reality, however, these safety benefits are often diminished because of adaptations by the driver, such as adopting a higher speed or driving closer to the vehicle in front. In current literature, I found many theories trying to explain why people adapt, but few studies investigating ways to prevent these negative adaptations from occurring (entire literature study is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/ for more detail). In this MSc. thesis I took the first step from explaining towards preventing behavioral adaptation, with the aim to make novel ADAS more effective in terms of safety.This thesis report is part of the fulfillment for the Master degree of Biomechanical Design at the Delft University of Technology. The driving simulator code, Matlab code used for the data analysis, and statistical analyses have been submitted to the BioMechanical Engineering depository on a USB stick, which is available on request. T. Melman Delft, May 2016iii Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank both my supervisors David Abbink and Joost de Winter for their enthusiasm and support during my MSc. thesis. David always knew how to motivate me, and was there to oversee the bigger picture, whereas Joost, with his keen eye for details, assisted me with tremendous devotion, especially during the last couple of weeks in order to send my thesis to a journal before my graduation. Although we had many memorable discussions, one moment in particular deserves to be mentioned in this acknowledgment; at Sunday evening prior to my experiment, I had some serious concerns. That very same evening, both helped me out, and took these concerns away. Despite the late hour, both were available to help me when I needed them the most. Abstract-An important issue in road traffic safety is that drivers show adverse behavioral adaptation (BA) to driver assistance systems. Haptic steering guidance is an upcoming assistance system which facilitates lane-keeping performance while keeping drivers in the loop, and which may be particularly prone to BA. Thus far, most experiments on haptic steering guidance have measured driver performance while the vehicle speed was kept constant, and so the degree of BA could not be established. The aim of the present driving simulator study was to examine whether haptic steering guidance causes BA in the form of speeding, and to evaluate two types of haptic steering guidance designed not to suffer from BA. Twenty-four participants drove a 1.8 m wide car for 13.9 km on a curved road, with cones demarcating a single 2.2 m narrow lane. Participants comple...

show abstract

Section: Effectiveness Of the Band Systemsupporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Bandwidth Guidance (Band)mentioning

confidence: 99%